In this Book

The Filipino Piecemeal Sugar Strike of 1924–1925

Book
by John E. Reinecke
1996
summary
The 1924 Filipino sugar strike came as a shocking blow to Hawaii's self-image. The tragic deaths at Hanapepe were regarded as an anomaly in Hawaii's peaceful, idyllic image. Yet as Reinecke's research clearly indicates, the sugar industry was building to a climax in the 1920s.

In the traditional sense, the strike was a "piecemeal" affair, lacking clear goals and having virtually no leadership or plans. These young, largely illiterate, Filipinos wrought massive changes into a more modern, industrial mode; into what was widely known thereafter as the Big Five. Evidence from the University of Hawaii's new archive collection, the H.S.P.A. Plantation Archives, not available to Dr. Reinecke completes the picture of the strike with evidence of the massive changes in management, recruitment and labor policies. The strike remains as he described it in his title: "The Piecemeal Strike." The new evidence rounds out the transformation of the industry.

Table of Contents

Cover

Frontmatter

Contents

pp. v-vi

Introduction

pp. vii-viii

Publisher’s Note

pp. ix-x

1. The Filipino Piecemeal Sugar Strike of 1924–1925

pp. 1-14

2. Cayetano Ligot versus Pablo Manlapit

pp. 15-26

3. A Hopeless, Irresponsible Strike

pp. 27-29

4. The Course of the Strike

pp. 30-34

5. HSPA Law and Order

pp. 35-37

6. The Strike on Oahu

pp. 38-49

7. The Strike on Hawaii

pp. 50-67

8. The Strike on Maui

pp. 68-70

.9 The Strike on Kauai

pp. 71-74

10. The Battle of Hanapepe

pp. 75-87

11. Pantaleon Inayuda and the Criminal Libel Case

pp. 88-91

12. The Conspiracy Trial

pp. 92-105

13. Oxiles, The Government Witnesses, and Amnesty

pp. 106-108

14. Manlapit’s Parole

pp. 109-111

15. A Decade of Little Change

pp. 112-114

16. Manlapit, Taok, Ligot

pp. 115-118

17. Jose Figueras’ Tour of Inspection

pp. 119-123

18. Exeunt Taok, Manlapit, and Butler

pp. 124-128

19. Epilogue

pp. 129-130

Postscript

pp. 131-138

Appendix A

pp. 139-142

Notes

pp. 143-185

Note on Sources

pp. 186-188

Bibliography

pp. 189-192

Index

pp. 193-197
Back To Top