In this Book

summary
Originally published in 1967. Literary scholars often acknowledge that Brecht borrowed from a variety of traditions, including Goethe, Schiller, expressionists, naturalists, and realists, all of whom affected his work. However, they tend not to address any single tradition as exclusively Brecht's. From these various literary traditions, Brecht borrowed formal elements only; compared with other writers to whom he is indebted, Brecht exceeds them in cynicism. They do not convey anything like his pitiless debunking attitude, his corrosive anti-romanticism, his hardheaded refusal to idealize or glorify, and his suspicion of all sentimentalities. This book discusses what the author identifies as the "Brechtian sensibility." Chroniclers of drama have not totally ignored the Brechtian tradition, but too often they are content to note merely that Brecht shared with some writers—particularly Büchner and Wedekind—a proclivity for open drama and episodes of racy realism tinged with poetic feeling. Other critics have not closely studied the various plays of this tradition in order to show how they constitute a distinctive and well-defined species of theater to which Brecht unmistakably belongs.

Table of Contents

Cover

New Copyright

Half Title

pp. i

Title Page

pp. ii-iii

Copyright

pp. iv

Dedication

pp. v

Contents

pp. vii

Acknowledgments

pp. ix

Introduction

pp. xi-xii

Half Title 1

pp. 1

Chapter one: J. M. R. Lenz

pp. 3-37

Chapter two: Christian Dietrich Grabbe

pp. 39-74

Chapter three: Georg Büchner

pp. 75-112

Chapter four: Frank Wedekind

pp. 113-136

Chapter five: Karl Kraus

pp. 137-156

Chapter six: Bertolt Brecht

pp. 157-200

Appendix

pp. 201

Introduction: The Tudor

pp. 203

The Tutor

pp. 205-212

Introduction: Napoleon or the Hundred Days

pp. 213-214

Napoleon or the Hundred Days

pp. 215-235

Introduction: The Last Days of Mankind

pp. 237

The Last Days of Mankind

pp. 239-261

Selected Bibliography

pp. 263-268

Index

pp. 269-271
Back To Top