In this Book

More than Mayor or Manager: Campaigns to Change Form of Government in America's Large Cities

Book
James H. Svara and Douglas J. Watson, Editors
2010
buy this book Buy This Book in Print
summary

Different forms of city government are in widespread use across the United States. The two most common structures are the mayor-council form and the council-manager form. In many large U.S. cities, there have been passionate movements to change the structure of city governments and equally intense efforts to defend an existing structure. Charter change (or preservation) is supported to solve problems such as legislative gridlock, corruption, weak executive leadership, short-range policies, or ineffective delivery of services. Some of these cities changed their form of government through referendum while other cities chose to retain the form in use.

More than Mayor or Manager offers in-depth case studies of fourteen large U.S. cities that have considered changing their form of government over the past two decades: St. Petersburg, Florida; Spokane, Washington; Hartford, Connecticut; Richmond, Virginia; San Diego, California; Oakland, California; Kansas City, Missouri; Grand Rapids, Michigan; Dallas, Texas; Cincinnati, Ohio; El Paso, Texas; Topeka, Kansas; St. Louis, Missouri; and Portland, Oregon.

The case studies shed light on what these constitutional contests teach us about different forms of government—the causes that support movements for change, what the advocates of change promised, what is at stake for the nature of elected and professional leadership and the relationship between leaders, and why some referendums succeeded while others failed. This insightful volume will be of special interest to leaders and interest groups currently considering or facing efforts to change the form of government as well as scholars in the field of urban studies.

Table of Contents

Cover

Frontmatter

Contents

pp. vii-viii

List of Illustrations

pp. ix

Preface

pp. xi-xiii

1 Introduction: Framing Constitutional Contests in Large Cities

pp. 1-22

PART I. CHANGE FROM COUNCIL–MANAGER TO MAYOR–COUNCIL FORM

2 St. Petersburg: Easing into a Strong-Mayor Government

pp. 25-45

3 Spokane: Development Debate Sparks Government Debate

pp. 47-62

4 Hartford: Politics Trumps Professionalism

pp. 63-80

5 Richmond: Implementation of and Experience with Strong-Mayor Form of Government

pp. 81-102

6 San Diego: Switch from Reform to Representative

pp. 103-120

7 Oakland: The Power of Celebrity? Explaining Strong-Mayor Charter Reform

pp. 121-138

PART II. REJECTED CHANGE FROM COUNCIL–MANAGER TO MAYOR–COUNCIL FORM

8 Kansas City: The Evolution of Council–Manager Government

pp. 141-161

9 Grand Rapids: A Lack of Enthusiasm for Change in the Council–Manager Form

pp. 163-181

10 Dallas: The Survival of Council–Manager Government

pp. 183-201

11 Cincinnati: Charter Conflict and Consensus

pp. 203-222

PART III. CHANGE FROM MAYOR–COUNCIL TO COUNCIL–MANAGER

12 El Paso: Professionalism over Politics in the Shift to Council–Manager Government

pp. 225-244

13 Topeka: Council–Manager Redux Finding Balance in the Politics–Administration Dichotomy

pp. 245-260

PART IV. REJECTED CHANGE TO MAYOR–COUNCIL FORM FROM COMMISSION AND WEAK MAYOR

14 St. Louis: Déjà Vu All over Again—Charter Reform Fails

pp. 263-277

15 Portland: ‘‘Keep Portland Weird,’’ Retaining the Commission Form of Government

pp. 279-301

16 Conclusion: Distinct Factors and Common Themes in Change of Form Referenda

pp. 303-323

List of Contributors

pp. 325-330

Index

pp. 331-346
Back To Top