In this Book

summary
Originally published in 1975. Following the vein of French historiography, many twentieth-century scholars of the French Revolution believed that the middle class of lawyers played a crucial role in the Revolution. In The Barristers of Toulouse, Lenard Berlanstein contends with that notion in a case study examining the response of the Toulousian legal community to the French Revolution. Using tax rolls, marriage contracts, and court records as primary sources, Professor Berlanstein argues that class interests—such as a desire to preserve their status in the cultured, conservative urban elite—led many Toulousian judges and lawyers to reject the Revolution and to remain loyal to the aristocratic Parlement. In other words, those in the legal community of Toulouse conducted themselves in ways that were consistent with other members of their social and economic class. To supplement his argument, Berlanstein's integrates methods from the New Social History movement.

Table of Contents

Cover Page

New Copyright

Halftitle

Series Page

Title Page

Copyright

Dedication

Contents

pp. ix

Tables, Figures, and Abbreviations

pp. x

Preface

pp. xi-xii

I. The Professional Life of the Barristers

pp. 1-31

II. Social and Economic Status

pp. 32-61

III. Social and Economic Advancement

pp. 62-92

IV. Ideas and Reforms in the Age of Enlightenment

pp. 93-122

V. The Barristers in Toulousan Society and Politics

pp. 123-147

VI. The Toulousan Barristers in the Revolution (1788–1793)

pp. 148-182

VII. Concluding Remarks

pp. 183-186

Appendix

pp. 187-189

Bibliography

pp. 191-204

Index

pp. 205-210
Back To Top