In this Book

Spenserian Satire: A Tradition of Indirection

Book
2017
summary
Scholars of Edmund Spenser have focused much more on his accomplishments in epic and pastoral than his work in satire. Scholars of early modern English satire almost never discuss Spenser. However, these critical gaps stem from later developments in the canon rather than any insignificance in Spenser's accomplishments and influence on satiric poetry. This book argues that the indirect form of satire developed by Spenser served during and after Spenser's lifetime as an important model for other poets who wished to convey satirical messages with some degree of safety. The book connects key Spenserian texts in The Shepheardes Calender and the Complaints volume with poems by a range of authors in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, including Joseph Hall, Thomas Nashe, Tailboys Dymoke, Thomas Middleton and George Wither, to advance the thesis that Spenser was seen by his contemporaries as highly relevant to satire in Elizabethan England.

Table of Contents

Cover

Half Title, Series Page, Title Page, Copyright

Contents

pp. v-vi

Acknowledgments

pp. vii-viii

Introduction

pp. 1-10

1. Indirect satire: theory and Spenserian practice

pp. 11-37

2. Spenser’s satire of indirection: affiliation, allusion, allegory

pp. 38-63

3. Spenser and the English literary system in the 1590s

pp. 64-86

4. Spenserian “entry codes”to indirect satire

pp. 87-118

5. Thomas Middleton’s satires before and after the Bishops’ Ban

pp. 119-144

6. After the Bishops’ Ban: imitation of Spenserian satire

pp. 145-172

Conclusion

pp. 173-176

Bibliography

pp. 177-195

Index

pp. 196-202
Back To Top