In this Book

The UN and Global Political Economy: Trade, Finance, and Development

Book
John Toye and Richard Toye
2004
buy this book Buy This Book in Print
summary

Against the backdrop of a 20-year revolt against free trade orthodoxy by economists inside the UN and their impact on policy discussions since the 1960s, the authors show how the UN both nurtured and inhibited creative and novel intellectual contributions to the trade and development debate. Presenting a stirring account of the main UN actors in this debate, The UN and Global Political Economy focuses on the accomplishments and struggles of UN economists and the role played by such UN agencies as the Department of Economic (and Social) Affairs, the United Nations Commission on Trade and Development, and the Economic Commission for Latin America (and the Caribbean). It also looks closely at the effects of the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s, the growing strength of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in the 1990s, and the lessons to be drawn from these and other recent developments.

Table of Contents

Cover

Table of Contents

pp. v

Foreword

pp. vii-ix

Acknowledgments

pp. xi-xii

List of Abbreviations

pp. xiii-xv

Introduction

pp. 1-16

1. The UN Trade and Development Debates of the 1940s

pp. 17-44

2. The UN Recruits Economists

pp. 45-62

3. Michal Kalecki, the World Economic Report, and McCarthyism

pp. 63-86

4. From Full Employment to Economic Development

pp. 87-109

5. The Early Terms-of-Trade Controversy

pp. 110-136

6. ECLA, Industralization, and Inflation

pp. 137-162

7. Competitive Coexistence and the Politics of Modernization

pp. 163-183

8. The Birth of UNCTAD

pp. 184-205

9. UNCTAD under Ra

pp. 206-229

10. World Monetary Problems and the Challenge of Commodities

pp. 230-253

11. The Conservative Counterrevolution of the 1980s

pp. 254-275

12. What Lessons for the Future?

pp. 276-298

Appendix: List of Archival Sources

pp. 299-300

Notes

pp. 301-372

Index

pp. 373-390

About the Authors

pp. 391

About the UN Intellectual History Project

pp. 393
Back To Top