In this Book

buy this book Buy This Book in Print
summary
In Expression vs. Equality, J. Tobin Grant and Thomas J. Rudolph argue that although public opinion plays a vital role in judicial rulings on the legalities of various finance reform options, political scientists have yet to realize fully the complexities and nuances of public attitudes toward campaign financing. The issue of campaign finance reform exposes a real conflict between the core democratic values of equality and expression. Economic inequalities, reformers argue, allow certain groups and individuals to exert undue influence in the political process, thereby threatening the democratic value of political equality. Opponents tend to frame the issue as a question of free speech: restrictions on campaign contributions are viewed as a threat to the democratic value of political expression. In the context of campaign finance, how do committed Americans rank the importance of equality and expression? How do they resolve the conflict between these competing democratic values? The answers to these questions, say the authors, depend heavily on whose influence and whose rights are perceived to be at stake. Using a series of unique experiments embedded in a national survey of the American electorate, they find that citizens’ commitment to the values of expression and equality in the campaign finance system is strongly influenced by their feelings or affect toward those whose rights and influence are perceived to be at stake. Freedom of speech is more highly valued in contexts where the respondent agrees with the issue in question; equity, on the other hand, is more highly valued when the respondent disagrees with the issue. These findings have implications not only for the continuing public debate over campaign finance reform, but also for our understanding of how citizens make tradeoffs between competing democratic values.

Table of Contents

Download PDF Download Full Book
  1. Cover
  2. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Title Page, Copyright Page
  2. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Table of Contents
  2. pp. v-vi
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. List of Tables
  2. pp. vii-viii
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Acknowledgments
  2. pp. ix-x
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 1. Campaign Finance Reform and the Thesis of Group-Centrism
  2. pp. 1-17
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 2. Framing and the Issue of Campaign Finance Reform
  2. pp. 18-31
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 3. Measuring Interest Group Affect
  2. pp. 32-47
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 4. Public Attitudes toward Interest Group Rights and Influence
  2. pp. 48-71
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 5. Public Attitudes toward Campaign Finance Reform
  2. pp. 72-96
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 6. The Salience of Campaign Finance Reform
  2. pp. 97-110
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. 7. Conclusions and Implications
  2. pp. 111-118
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Measurement Appendix
  2. pp. 119-126
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Notes
  2. pp. 127-128
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Bibliography
  2. pp. 129-138
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Index of Names
  2. pp. 139-142
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Index of Terms
  2. pp. 143-144
  3. open access
    • Download PDF Download
Back To Top