In this Book

Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing

Book
Ken Hyland
2013
summary
Why do engineers "report" while philosophers "argue" and biologists "describe"? In the Michigan Classics Edition of Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing, Ken Hyland examines the relationships between the cultures of academic communities and their unique discourses. Drawing on discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, and the voices of professional insiders, Ken Hyland explores how academics use language to organize their professional lives, carry out intellectual tasks, and reach agreement on what will count as knowledge. In addition, Disciplinary Discourses presents a useful framework for understanding the interactions between writers and their readers in published academic writing. From this framework, Hyland provides practical teaching suggestions and points out opportunities for further research within the subject area. As issues of linguistic and rhetorical expression of disciplinary conventions are becoming more central to teachers, students, and researchers, the careful analysis and straightforward style of Disciplinary Discourses make it a remarkable asset. The Michigan Classics Edition features a new preface by the author and a new foreword by John M. Swales.

Table of Contents

Cover

pp. 1-1

Title Page, Copyright

pp. 2-5

Foreword

pp. v-vi

Contents

pp. vii-viii

Preface

pp. ix-xiv

Acknowledgements

pp. xv-xvi

1. Disciplinary cultures, texts and interactions

pp. 1-19

2. Academic attribution: interaction through citation

pp. 20-40

3. Praise and criticism: interactions in book reviews

pp. 41-62

4. Speaking as an insider: promotion and credibility in abstracts

pp. 63-84

5. Priority and prudence: the scientific letter

pp. 85-103

6. Constructing an expert identity: interactions in textbooks

pp. 104-131

7. Researching and teaching academic writing

pp. 132-154

8. Power, authority and discourse change

pp. 155-176

Endwords

pp. 176-178

Appendix 1: Corpora

pp. 179-187

Appendix 2: Items expressing doubt and certainty investigated

pp. 188-189

Appendix 3: Metadiscourse items investigated

pp. 190-193

References

pp. 194-207

Subject Index

pp. 208-209

Author Index

pp. 210-211
Back To Top