In this Book

Learning the Hard Way: Masculinity, Place, and the Gender Gap in Education

Book
Edward W. Morris
2012
summary

An avalanche of recent newspapers, weekly newsmagazines, scholarly journals, and academic books has helped to spark a heated debate by publishing warnings of a “boy crisis” in which male students at all academic levels have begun falling behind their female peers. In Learning the Hard Way, Edward W. Morris explores and analyzes detailed ethnographic data on this purported gender gap between boys and girls in educational achievement at two low-income high schools—one rural and predominantly white, the other urban and mostly African American. Crucial questions arose from his study of gender at these two schools. Why did boys tend to show less interest in and more defiance toward school? Why did girls significantly outperform boys at both schools? Why did people at the schools still describe boys as especially “smart”?

            Morris examines these questions and, in the process, illuminates connections of gender to race, class, and place. This book is not simply about the educational troubles of boys, but the troubled and complex experience of gender in school. It reveals how particular race, class, and geographical experiences shape masculinity and femininity in ways that affect academic performance. His findings add a new perspective to the “gender gap” in achievement.

Table of Contents

Title Page, Copyright

Contents

pp. vii

Acknowledgments

pp. ix-x

1. Introduction

pp. 1-19

2. Respect and Respectability

pp. 20-34

3. The Hidden Injuries of Gender

pp. 35-48

4. Too Cool for School: Masculinity and the Contradictions of Achievement

pp. 49-76

5. Rednecks and Rutters: Rural Masculinity and Class Anxiety

pp. 77-101

6. Clownin’ and Riffin’: Urban Masculinity and the Complexity of Race

pp. 102-127

7. “Girls Just Care about It More”: Femininity and Achievement As Resistance

pp. 128-149

8. Friday Night Fights

pp. 150-168

9. Conclusion

pp. 169-177

Appendix: Research Methods: Process and Representation

pp. 179-186

Notes

pp. 187-189

References

pp. 191-199

Index

pp. 201-212
Back To Top