In this Book

Rhetorical Strategies and Genre Conventions in Literary Studies: Teaching and Writing in the Disciplines

Book
Laura Wilder
2012
summary

Laura Wilder fills a gap in the scholarship on writing in the disciplines and writing across the curriculum with this thorough study of the intersections between scholarly literary criticism and undergraduate writing in introductory literature courses. Rhetorical Strategies and Genre Conventions in Literary Studies is the first examination of rhetorical practice in the research and teaching of literary study and a detailed assessment of the ethics and efficacy of explicit instruction in the rhetorical strategies and genre conventions of the discipline.

Using rhetorical analysis, ethnographic observation, and individual interviews, Wilder demonstrates how rhetorical conventions play a central, although largely tacit, role in the teaching of literature and the evaluation of student writing. Wilder follows a group of literature majors and details their experiences. Some students received experimental, explicit instruction in the special topoi, while others received more traditional, implicit instruction.

Arguing explicit instruction in disciplinary conventions has the potential to help underprepared students, Wilder explores how this kind of instruction may be incorporated into literature courses without being overly reductive. Taking into consideration student perspectives, Wilder makes a bold case for expanding the focus of research in writing in the disciplines and writing across the curriculum in order to grasp the full complexity of disciplinary discourse.

Table of Contents

Cover

pp. c-ii

Book Title

pp. iii-iii

Copyright

pp. iv-iv

Contents

pp. v-vi

Acknowledgments

pp. vii-x

Introduction

pp. 1-26

1. “The Rhetoric of Literary Criticism” Revisited: Mistaken Critics, Complex Contexts, and Social Justice

pp. 27-54

2. “You Wouldn’t Want to Introduce That to Undergraduate Students”: Literature Professors’ Views of Disciplinarity and Student Discourse

pp. 55-77

3. “This Is How We Do Things”: Professors’ Expectations for Student Writing

pp. 78-107

4. “Some Tools to Take with Them”: Making Disciplinary Conventions Explicit

pp. 108-133

5. “Other Professors, They Assume You Already Know This Stuff”: Student Views of Disciplinary Enculturation and Explicating Conventions

pp. 134-173

6. “There Were Negative Results for Me”: Faculty Resistance to Explicit Instruction in Disciplinary Rhetoric

pp. 174-204

Notes

pp. 205-212

References

pp. 213-228

Index

pp. 229-237

Author Biography

pp. 238-238

Back Cover

pp. bc-bc
Back To Top