In this Book

Changing of Knowledge in Composition: Contemporary Perspectives

Book
Lance Massey and Richard C Gephardt
2010
summary

Lance Massey and Richard Gebhardt offer in this collection many signs that composition again faces a moment of precariousness, even as it did in the 1980s—the years of the great divorce from literary studies. The contours of writing in the university again are rapidly changing, making the objects of scholarship in composition again unstable. Composition is poised to move not from modern to postmodern but from process to postprocess, from a service-oriented "field" to a research-driven "discipline." Some would say we are already there. Momentum is building to replace "composition" and the pedagogical imperative long implied in that term with a "writing studies" model devoted to the study of composition as a fundamental tool of, and force within, all areas of human activity.

Appropriately, contributors here use Stephen M. North's 1987 book The Making of Knowledge in Composition to frame and background their discussion, as they look at both the present state of the field and its potential futures. As in North's volume, The Changing of Knowledge in Composition describes a body of research and pedagogy brimming with conflicting claims, methodologies, and politics, and with little consensus regarding the proper subjects and modes of inquiry.

The deep ambivalence within the field itself is evident in this collection. Contributors here envision composition both as retaining its commitment to broad-based, generalized writing instruction and as heading toward content-based vertical writing programs in departments and programs of writing studies. They both challenge and affirm composition's pedagogical heritage. And they sound both sanguine and pessimistic notes about composition's future.

Table of Contents

Cover

Frontmatter

Contents

Introduction: Making Knowledge in Composition Then, Now, and in the Future

pp. 1-10

Notes on the Origins of The Making of Knowledge in Composition

pp. 11-14

Part One: Personal Responses to The Making of Knowledge In Composition

1. The Significance of North’s The Making of Knowledge in Composition for Graduate Education

pp. 17-27

2. The World According to North—and Beyond: The Changing Geography of Composition Studies

pp. 28-44

Part Two: Working the Field: Knowledge - Making Communities Since The Making of Knowledge in Composition

3. The Epistemic Paradoxes of “Lore”: From The Making of Knowledge in Composition to the Present (Almost)

pp. 47-62

4. Philosophies of Invention Twenty Years after The Making of Knowledge in Composition

pp. 63-83

5. Making Knowledge, Shaping History: Critical Consciousness and the Historical Impulse in Composition Studies

pp. 84-101

6. Makers of Knowledge in Writing Centers: Practitioners, Scholars, and Researchers at Work

pp. 102-120

7. Rhetoric, Racism, and the Remaking of Knowledge-Making in Composition

pp. 121-134

Part Three: The Making of Knowledge in Composition and Education: Undergraduate, Graduate, and Beyond

8. Undergraduate Researchers as Makers of Knowledge in Composition in the Writing Studies Major

pp. 137-160

9. Pedagogy, Lore, and the Making of Being

pp. 161-172

10. Practice as Inquiry, Stephen M. North’s Teaching and Contemporary Public Policy

pp. 173-193

11. On the Place of Writing in Higher Education (and Why It Doesn’t Include Composition)

pp. 194-210

Part Four: Disciplinary Identities, Disciplinary Challenges: Unity, Multiplicity, and Fragmentation

12. Stephen North’s The Making of Knowledge in Composition and the Future of Composition Studies “Without Paradigm Hope”

pp. 213-235

13. Are We There Yet? The Making of a Discipline in Composition

pp. 236-263

14. Coordinating Citations and the Cartography of Knowledge: Finding True North in Five Scholarly Journals

pp. 264-282

15. Making Space in Composition Studies: Discursive Ecologies as Inquiry

pp. 283-304

16. The (Dis)Order of Composition: Insights from the Rhetoric and Reception of The Making of Knowledge in Composition

pp. 305-322

Afterword

pp. 323-325

Index

pp. 326-331

About the Authors

pp. 332-335
Back To Top