In this Book

summary

Citizens in democracies complain that political parties’ positions on major issues are too ambiguous for them to confidently understand. Why is party position ambiguity so common? Are party positions ambiguous because political parties fail in forming clear policies or because they deliberately blur their positions? Rationality of Irrationality argues that political parties are motivated to strategically blur their position on an issue when they struggle with a certain disadvantage in the issue. Specifically, political parties present an ambiguous position when their own supporters are divided in their stances on the issue. A political party also blurs position stances when voters do not acknowledge that the party has the ability and integrity to solve problems related to the issue. Political parties blur their position in these cases because ambiguous party positions divert voters’ attention from the issue. Voters support a political party whose policy positions on major issues are close to their own stances. However, voters cannot confidently and exactly estimate party positions on an issue when they are only ambiguous.

Table of Contents

Download EPUB Download Full EPUB
  1. Cover
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Half Title
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Title Page
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Copyright Page
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Dedication
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Contents
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Tables
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Figures
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Abbreviations
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. One. Introduction
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Two. A Theory of Position Blurring
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Three. Measuring Position Blurring
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Four. Position Blurring and Voter Behavior
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Five. Issue Disadvantage, Party-Competition Environment, and Issue Avoidance
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Six. Radical Right-Wing Parties' Position Blurring on the Economy
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Seven. Social Democratic Parties' Position Blurring on Immigration
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Eight. Concluding Remarks
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Appendix
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Appendix A Data Description
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Appendix B Distribution of Experts’ Estimations
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Appendix C The Construction of Left-Right and Libertarian-Authoritarian Positions from the EES (2009) in Figure 7.1
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Notes
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. References
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
  1. Index
  2. open access
    • View HTML View
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.