In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Building a Timeline for LGBTQ+ Global Cinemas (1910-2019):Movie Production Trends from a Collaborative Internet Cinema Database
  • Manuel Hernández-Pérez (bio) and Juan José Sánchez-Soriano (bio)

the lgbtq+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual identities and orientations) community has struggled to achieve social acceptance, political representation, and recognition of their civil rights. Their demands respond to exclusions and oppressions suffered historically. Even today, this struggle continues in many countries. Equal rights to marriage and adoption have not yet been recognized in all societies, and in some countries, sexual diversity is even punishable by death. Audiovisual media, particularly cinema, has the ability not only to function as a device for the production and creation of reality, but also to act as a reflection of reality and social changes (Gross; Williams), such as when recognizing sexual diversity. Media has a key role as a socializer, comparable to the role held by institutions such as school or family (Rosengren 6).

Cinema, as the most influential medium of the twentieth century, has reflected the struggles of the LGBTQ+ community, mirroring a significant period in the history of humanity regarding the advancement of civil and political rights. This has taken place through different channels. The first channel consists of commercial and mainstream movies that typically have come out of Hollywood and the United States. As one of the main cinema "super producers," Hollywood industry has shaped the market, ruling over the box office and influencing the content of movies. However, in the last few decades, content also has reflected transnationalization as a way of appealing to different cultural markets and reflecting the diversity of global audiences (Crane 378). A second venue for reflection of these changes has been the independent cinema circuits, though they have been aimed, traditionally, at a rather minority audience. While both of these production models—the so-called mainstream and indie films—participate in the representation of characters and themes of the LGBTQ+ community, these have been decoded in different and often opposite ways. Independent cinema, including documentary and avant-garde cinema, has been conceptualized in part as a response to the "dominant mode of American (heterosexist) filmmaking" and, therefore, identified with the "queer" (Benshoff and Griffin, Queer Images: A History 11). On the other hand, for other authors, the parameters defining queer cinema are diverse and fluid, beyond binary classifications. Queerness is here understood as a component that can be presented through different types of cinemas, manifesting different forms of queer representation and participation/identification among filmmakers (Schoonover and Galt 15). [End Page 46]

Until now, studies on the representation of the LGBTQ+ community in the media have focused on particular case studies instead of adopting a holistic approach; for instance, the film outputs in specific decades, such as the media ecosystem of the 1990s (Becker). There also have been studies about specific national markets, but often the focus is on USA productions (Benshoff and Griffin, Queer Images: A History of Gay). Although LGBTQ+ and queer cinemas have been researched from a global perspective, the research has been carried out as different forms of qualitative textual analysis (Davies; Russo; Tyler), with a focus on a cultural interpretation of the qualities of filmic texts. Some exceptions in the form of research with a global and quantitative focus have been successful but, to our knowledge, only in other audiovisual markets such as digital games (Shaw and Friesem). Therefore, a quantitative analysis of global cinema seems to be needed to establish an updated comparative criterion on a global scale and to verify the real state of affairs. Hitherto, databases constructed through users' collaboration and big data analysis have been usually compared with users' attitudes to social behavior including gender or violence (Gosselt et al.) or the success of a particular product, measured through users' movie rating and recommendation systems (Canet Centellas et al.). The approach adopted in this article also is innovative, employing a collaborative-constructed database with the aim of studying synchronic and diachronic trends within global LGBTQ+ cinemas.

We propose a historical review and the global mapping of two phenomena: film production and the development of social rights. With this objective, a methodology based...

pdf