Quakers, the Quiet Revolutionaries by Janet Paxton Gardner (review)

An ambitious and inspiring documentary film intended for the general public, Quakers, the Quiet Revolutionaries provides a broad introduction both to Quakers as a contemporary religious group—primarily the more liberal part – and to the history of Quakers in early modern England and in America. Award-winning documentary film director Janet Paxton Gardner and senior producer Richard E. Nurse worked with a star-studded cast of Quaker historians and scholars, both as consultants (Max Carter, Ben Pink Dandelion, Thomas Hamm, Candace McCoy, and Andrew Murphy) and as on-screen interviewees, ensuring that the factual background and the general narrative of particular sections are authoritative. Indeed, as he introduced a screening at the Friends General Conference Gathering in 2020 Nurse joked tongue-in-cheek about how the ongoing research "led to dozens and dozens of tiresome corrections, reshoots, and film edits, to get the thing right. We hope it's made us better Quakers." Gardner mixes a wealth of visual imagery (photographs, maps, prints, portraits, historic buildings) with occasional scenes of re-enactors playing such figures as William Penn and John Woolman, making viewing absorbing and enjoyable.

As any such work must, the film emphasizes a particular storyline, in this case social reformers and activists such as Woolman, Lucretia Mott, Levi Coffin, Alice Paul, and Bayard Rustin, with present-day activist concerns represented by the Earth Quaker Action Team. The descriptions of contemporary faith and practice bear a recognizable connection to the filmmakers' context in Philadelphia Yearly Meeting and other parts of the liberal, unprogrammed branch. They do make a good effort to present the breadth of Quaker history and current practice, showing scenes in Kenyan and evangelical American Friends churches, and mentioning the nineteenth century splits and missionary work. One wonders what expressions of faith and which parts of Quaker history members of these branches might have chosen to emphasize were they making the film.

Happily, the film's willingness to reflect on unexpected results and revised understandings of Quaker history gives viewers many opportunities to ask just such questions. Examples include the observation that William Penn owned slaves juxtaposed with acknowledgment of his influence on political and religious liberty; and mention of the beginnings of solitary confinement in Quaker prison reform. Additional uncomplimentary chapters could have been included, such as the large numbers of eighteenth-century Quakers who enslaved their workers in Barbados and Rhode Island, and the nineteenth-century Quaker support of Indian boarding schools which attempted to eradicate Native American culture; nevertheless, compressing all of Quaker history into the scope of an hour (or 79 minutes in the extended version) inevitably means omissions and trade-offs. The film still provides plenty of food for thought, noting for instance the conflicts among different kinds of American Quakers during the presidencies of Hoover and Nixon, and the resistance to integrating Quaker schools around the time of the civil rights movement.

These instances of reassessment framed within a generally idealistic tone, along with the chapter-based structure, encourage further investigation and make the film a versatile resource for classroom use in high school and college courses in history and religious studies. Among Quaker congregations looking for an overview of Quaker history and beliefs for group study, some meetings will find familiar touchstones while others may find their version of the faith acknowledged but less well represented. Broadcast on public television stations reaching audiences of hundreds of thousands, the film has already had a deservedly wide impact, and provides a stirring summary of Quaker social impact well-contextualized within the scope of wider Quaker history.