In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

PrefaceqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Discove ring an a poste riori ord e r in a varie d colle ction of e ssay s is an artificial e nte rprise .Ye t, such artificiality fascinate d the thinke rs and write rs of the e ighte e nth ce nturyin Europe . The re ad e rsof this volume will take , I trust, sub tlee sthe ticple asure in the re alization that, through no fault of the e d itor,the se e ssay sas a group tre at, with vary ing e mphasis, one of the unive rsal prob­ le ms that confronte d the write rs of the Enlighte nme nt. In fact, had a title b e e n re quire dfor this colle ction, I would have provid e d some thing like “Seeing is Believing: Essays on Cultural Perception in the Eighteenth Century.” For the majority of the essays in volume six of Studies in Eighteenth-C entury C ulture treat percep­ tual activities as specific as reading or as general as recognizing the presence of an Other: the self, another, or other societies. The analysis of the act of perception and how it leads to cognition and how the resultant knowledge is turned into action does provide the artificial order referred to above. This is a strongly literary volume, with a good number of essays on the verbal arts (though one, that of Professor Carroll, deals effectively with how one French composer “perceived” Horace and brought him into the musical context of the eight­ eenth century). Among the dominant figures in this collection are Johnson, Lessing, Rousseau, Franklin, Prevost, Swift, and Wollstonecraft . However, such a bias is to be expected, since literature was, more than any other artifact, at the interface of the self and ix XcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA / Preface society. It dealt then, even more than now, in a consistently efficacious and insinuating way, with perception and the processes of cognition. In one of the most influential essays written in the eighteenth century, we read, The fact of our existence is the first thing taught us by our sensations and, indeed, is inseparable from them. From this it follows that our first reflective ideas must be concerned with ourselves, that is to say, must concern that thinking principle which constitutes our nature and which is in no way distinct from ourselves. The second thing taught us by our sensations is the existence of external objects, among which we must include our own bodies, since they are, so to speak, external to us even before we have defined the nature of the thinking principle within us. This passage, written and published at mid-century, comes from D’Alembert’s “Preliminary Discourse” to the Encyclopedie. It is the formalization of two of the most significant ethical and esthetic preoccupations of the eighteenth century, namely, how civilized man perceives others, himself, and his cultures, and how he defines the relationships among these activities. There are several essays in this volume which examine in depth such concerns as cultural definition and perception. Pierre Aubery’s essay subtly delineates the complex way in which the French saw the English in America, as well as how the European French perceived the American French. He shows how stereo­ typical images became concretized and discusses the political significance of their maintenance. There are also several papers (forming one of the ISECS workshops) which deal effectively with the perception of women and of woman’s “place” in the context of eighteenth-century society. Besides Professor Myers’ somewhat revisionist view ofMary Wollstonecraft, Professors Cynthia Matlack, Irene Dash, and Roseann Runte all discuss the relationship between cultural values and esthetic considerations in terms of the de­ piction of women in literature and on the stage. Dash’s paper especially shows to what lengths writers went to define and Preface IqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJ xi propagate a fe minine image consonant with the d ominant pe r­ ce ption of the social function of woman. Spe cifically ,she d is­ cusse s how Shake spe are ’s A W inter’s Tale was b owd le rize d so that “the weaker sex” syndrome could be emphasized. Christine Sjogren’s essay analyzes the role...

pdf

Share