Although Brian Friel's Translations (1980) dramatizes the process of linguistic standardization undertaken by the nineteenth-century Ordnance Survey of Ireland, scholars have yet to use standardization as a conceptual lens for reading the play. Building on Jonathan H. Grossman's argument for standardization as a paradigm for literary study, my reading shifts the focus from what standardization erodes, which is the emphasis of existing scholarship, to how it works. By revealing standardization's mechanics, the play both undermines the map's authority and uncovers what makes it an effective instrument so as to claim the map's power for the very communities it has marginalized. The play's critical insight is that the standardized topographic map technically treats Irish and English names equivalently, a revelation that allows Friel's characters to appropriate the map's logic for a project of Irish cultural repossession. Learning the new place-names morphs into a metaphor for the development of an Irish English idiom, or a uniquely Irish form of English that could serve as a linguistic home not only for the dispossessed in the fictional town of Baile Beag but also for the cultural exiles in Friel's fraught political moment. Translations offers a case study for how the concept of standardization might inform future postcolonial literary analysis.


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 39-70
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.