In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • 'Observing' the Arctic: Asia in the Arctic Council and Beyond ed. by Chih Yuan Woon and Klaus Dodds
  • Marc Lanteigne (bio)
'Observing' the Arctic: Asia in the Arctic Council and Beyond. Edited by Chih Yuan Woon and Klaus Dodds. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar, 2020. Hardcover: 243 pp.

Although many observers have pointed to 2007 as the watershed year when the Arctic first gained its current level of global attention—as that was the year Russia used a submarine to plant its national flag on the seabed at the North Pole—2013 can be considered as equally important. For in that year, the Arctic Council, by far the most prominent organization overseeing policies in the Far North, granted observer status to five Asian countries: China, India, Japan, Singapore and South Korea. It was a difficult decision, as it was made amid rising speculation about a "scramble" for Arctic resources. Nevertheless, the move underscored the rising attention that the region had been receiving from non-Arctic states and highlighted the question of whether the title of regional stakeholder should only be limited to the "Arctic Eight" (Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden and the United States).

'Observing' the Arctic addresses this question from multiple angles, discussing not only the perspectives of the states involved but also those of sub-state and non-state actors, such as indigenous organizations, scientific bodies and business interests. The eleven chapters of the book are divided into two broad sections, with the first looking at institutions and Arctic regimes, including those linked to the Council, and how Asian governments have addressed them, while the second features an analysis of specific case studies within the Asian states themselves. The book specifically examines how these Asian observers have added a new dimension to the concept of a "global Arctic", and discusses the differences in Arctic policies of non-Arctic Asian states from those of their Arctic partners. However, this book not only provides a description of the specific interests which Asian states have developed in the Arctic, but also seeks to frame them within longer historical and cultural narratives which, the authors argue, has been lacking in recent media coverage of polar regional diplomacy. A key argument of the book is that the five Asian states have developed multifaceted approaches to engaging the Arctic which extend well beyond perceived windows of economic opportunity created by climate change and greater access to resources. In addition, the volume goes beyond studies of interstate politics in the region, delving deeper into the questions of national identity, and how they are constructed, in the Far North. [End Page 443]

Understandably, much of the book is dedicated to China, which has been under intense international scrutiny for its strategic intentions regarding the Arctic. One specific concern, elucidated in the chapter by Nadezhda Filimonova, is China's cooperation with Russia in the Arctic, leading to discussions about whether an "Arctic alliance" is on the cards. However, Filimonova suggests that Russian views on China's Arctic engagement, while largely favourable, are dominated by joint economic interests as opposed to grand strategies. At the same time, in the chapter by Nong Hong, Beijing is painted as seeking to widen and deepen its Arctic engagement, including adding the Arctic Ocean to its Belt and Road Initiative, while experiencing growing levels of pushback, led by the United States. This chapter makes clear, however, that China is not going to be satisfied as a passive observer as the Arctic continues to open. Unlike some other recent studies on China's Arctic diplomacy, notably the 2017 work China as a Polar Great Power, which have adopted more narrow, hard power approaches to explaining China's Arctic interests, this volume examines Beijing's Arctic policies in a more multifaceted and nuanced manner. It also benefits from the availability of new information provided in China's 2018 White Paper on the Arctic.

China may be the "first among equals" among the five Asian observer states, especially in terms of visibility, but the other Asian states have also helped shape the "internationalization" of many Arctic policies in both the scientific and political domains. It is therefore regrettable that...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 443-445
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.