In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture, vol. 5, US Popular Print Culture to 1860 ed. by Ronald J. Zboray and Mary Saracino Zboray
  • Tracy Bonfitto
The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture, vol. 5, US Popular Print Culture to 1860
edited by Ronald J. Zboray and Mary Saracino Zboray
OXFORD: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2019. 736 PP. (HARDCOVER), $135
ISBN: 978-0-1987-3481-9

The most recently released volume of the nine-volume series The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture will likely serve as an excellent resource for scholars of print culture for years to come. The forty essays in the present volume, which is focused on print culture in the United States from that nation's colonial beginnings through its antebellum period, aim to provide "a people's history of popular print culture" (4). As such, the focus is on "imprints" in their many varied forms, that is, essentially anything a press might produce (5). The volume's authors contextualize reading cultures within their broader interaction with the written word, including, for example, oral performances and larger social, production, and circulation environments, as well as the ways in which nonliterate populations have interacted with and been affected by print. The resulting volume is a broad-reaching resource that greatly contributes to our understanding of popular print culture even as it opens innumerable paths for further research.

The volume's four parts are arranged to resist chronology and with it, presumably, any appearance of progression or hierarchy. Instead, they are organized to represent "stratification," with an eye to demonstrating a "dynamic of continuity and change" (10). What this looks like in practice is that the chapters within the individual sections are arranged alphabetically by topic, and each of the parts builds conceptually upon those proceeding it. Part 1, "Foundations," focuses on the infrastructure and origins of early governmental, business, and religious imprints and explores approaches to readership and authorship, as well as education and circulation. Part 2, "Preindustrial Era," sets a stage soon to be greatly altered by advances in technology and introduces a diversity of important categories of imprints, including almanacs, captivity narratives, ephemera, and magazines. Part 3, "Mass Market Emergence," examines changes precipitated by technological advances, including the proliferation and increasing importance of engravings, lithographs, and photographs used as illustrations and the different ways in which oral and stage performances also interacted and interfaced with print culture. "Segmentation and Diversity," the volume's final section, focuses on imprints marketed to and created by a number of diverse populations. Throughout the volume, diaries, letters, and annotated, hand-copied, or otherwise altered published texts act as important source material and are presented as a means of reconstructing the voices and everyday experiences of Americans.

Of course, such a method is necessarily limited, and the impossibility of the task of building anything like a representative sample of early American readers is acknowledged [End Page 198] throughout the volume. The focus on "fleeting" materials such as ephemera provides a different type of valuable perspective on the "micro-historical," as William Huntting Howell puts it (207). The editors of the volume resist providing a guiding or unified definition of "popular," and this approach has its limits. Each author is left to tackle—or, as is more often the case, to avoid establishing—his or her own working definition. Perhaps more enlightening than any single definition offered by an individual author is Seth Perry's list of caveats to his own use of the word (176). These caveats help to illustrate one of the book's unspoken challenges: the very term upon which the study is organized is a fraught and problematic one.

When the book is viewed as a whole, several recurring themes emerge and offer important broad takeaways significant to any study of print culture in early America. Importantly, attention is paid, for example, to the preexisting discourses that were supplanted or altered as a result of European colonialism, to alternate forms of literacy, and to the enduring prevalence of print imports from England. Nearly every chapter touches on the changes ushered in by technological advances, and, when taken together, the chapters provide a...

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
2166-3033
Print ISSN
2164-8034
Pages
pp. 198-199
Launched on MUSE
2020-06-18
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.