In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Numbered Lives: Life and Death in Quantum Media by Jacqueline Wernimont
  • John Henry Adams
Numbered Lives: Life and Death in Quantum Media
by Jacqueline Wernimont
CAMBRIDGE, MA: MIT PRESS, 2019. 240 PP. (HARDCOVER), $32.00
ISBN: 978-0-2620-3904-8

Jacqueline Wernimont's Numbered Lives: Life and Death in Quantum Media serves two main purposes. First, it analyzes the use of mathematics to mediate human behavior, and second, it examines how quantum media are not universal but rather take men (in particular, white Christian men) as their baseline. Literary or historical scholars interested in the history of quantum media will be interested in the book based purely on its subject matter, but the book is also particularly strong as an introduction to the problems inherent in data collection and as such is an essential book for students and scholars making their first forays into digital humanities.

Wernimont succinctly defines quantum media as "media that count, quantify, or enumerate" (1), a definition that encompasses early print materials, analog counting devices, and digital data. Historically, Numbered Lives has a broad scope, beginning in the seventeenth century and continuing up to the twenty-first century, and Wernimont divides the project not chronologically but thematically: the book is subdivided into two parts concerned with the counting of death(s) and life (i.e., the tracking of human movement), respectively. Throughout both parts, she uses a critical lens of mediation to examine how media serve to filter human experiences and to shape personal identity, arguing that quantum media are not passively counting information about human activity but are integral parts of how we live our lives. More specifically, Wernimont is concerned about how the quantum media she studies mediate gender and race, noting that even as quantum media count and track lives, "some lives become meaningful and countable because others are either differently counted or not counted at all; some lives are rendered valuable by the devaluing of others" (11).

In the two chapters in the part titled "Counting Death," Wernimont discusses the publication of media related to death during the eighteenth century. She notes that mortality bills published by parish clerks, scientific books like John Graunt's Natural and Political Observations (1662), and colonial broadsides all served as a means of using mathematics to exert control over dangers, whether to react to outbreaks of plague or to reimagine the risks inherent in colonizing the Americas. This tendency is carried forward into ships' registers, censuses, and twenty-first-century online death registers, all of which Wernimont observes are aimed at identifying a specific, narrow subsection of the population, namely, white men of property. Women's contributions to the establishment of the statistics that enable those quantum media (or, indeed, the deaths of nonwhite men) are quietly overlooked or forgotten. This in turn raises grave concerns over the reliability of quantum [End Page 196] media as data for analysis in digital humanities projects: the archive, even when it appears thorough or complete, tends to deal only with a subset of the larger population.

In the two chapters in the part titled "Counting Life," Wernimont focuses in particular on the pedometer, whose antecedents she traces as far back as the nineteenth century. While the pedometer took its origins from an interest in measuring land, she notes that it became a method of surveilling human behavior relatively quickly, so that by the nineteenth century, it was being used to surreptitiously monitor the travels, work, and exercise of both men and women. At the same time, however, the technology was primarily geared around a quintessentially white masculine lifestyle and monitoring walking, cycling, or heart rate: Wernimont notes that, tellingly, devices and apps designed to conveniently monitor menstrual cycles or breastfeeding schedules were late in coming even in the twenty-first century (142). Similarly, pedometers appear to have been a largely white phenomenon: pedometers made few inroads into the African American community. When African Americans were counted, it was as financial investments (144–45). At the same time that the data collected through these devices privileged white male behavior as a baseline, it additionally served as a guideline for...

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
2166-3033
Print ISSN
2164-8034
Pages
pp. 196-197
Launched on MUSE
2020-06-18
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.