Abstract

Abstract:

Neville's comparative study of religion cannot be neatly categorized into current divisions of human knowledge of religion. Its comparative method of vague categories remains hospitable to varying scholarly interests. With the help of this methodology, Neville contributes in a sui generis fashion to the Christian-Ru transcendence debate. An analysis of these three aspects of Neville's work supports reflection upon the nature and future of comparative study of religion.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
2156-4795
Print ISSN
0194-3448
Pages
pp. 11-30
Launched on MUSE
2020-03-25
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.