In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Fanáticos, Exiles, and Spies: Revolutionary Failures on the US–Mexico Border, 1923–1930 by Julian F. Dodson
  • Aaron W. Navarro (bio)
Fanáticos, Exiles, and Spies: Revolutionary Failures on the US–Mexico Border, 1923–1930. By Julian F. Dodson. (College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2019. Pp. x, 228. $45.00 cloth)

In this exceptional new monograph, Julian Dodson presents “the story of the postrevolutionary Mexican government’s attempts to protect its northern border from various plots hatched among Mexican exile groups in the United States” (p. 2). In the immediate aftermath of the Mexican Revolution, the governments of Álvaro Obregón and Plutarco Elías Calles struggled to establish a functioning central government while fending off irredentist movements of all political stripes. Dodson focuses our attention on the Mexican exile communities in the United States, particularly in cities such as El Paso, San Antonio, Tucson, and Los Angeles. He argues that the composition of those right-leaning, more stridently Catholic, and politically aggrieved communities made them a fertile and auspicious space for counterrevolutionary movements that developed through the decade of the 1920s.

The study focuses on the rebellion of the one-time Sonoran Dynasty member, Adolfo de la Huerta, in 1923 and the Cristero War that stretched from 1926 to 1929. Dodson considers several smaller plots of rebellion that never quite got off the ground and some larger ones that did, such as the Francisco Serrano and Arnulfo Gómez military revolt of 1927 and José Gonzalo Escobar’s failed putsch of 1929. Dodson argues that the possibilities for cross-border rebellious alliances diminished sharply after the failure of Escobar’s revolt in 1929, as Mexican and U.S. interests converged around a less-porous border for weapons and rebels. The book offers tremendous new detail concerning the serial rebellions that confronted Calles in the 1920s. In a critical advance, Dodson also relates this history of armed conflict through a parallel lens, as a “borderland battle [that] was fought in the field of espionage between the undercover agents of the Confidential Department and groups of political exiles temporarily residing in cities such as Los Angeles, Tucson, San Antonio, and Brownsville” (p. 2).

The treatment of “Catholic Exiles and Conspiratorial Networks” in chapter four was perhaps the most interesting development for this reader. Dodson makes the case that “just as the revolution produced its own set of exiles, so too did the Cristero Rebellion” (p. 115). He argues further that “the Cristero Rebellion initiated a new stage of American Catholic activism” in which conservatives north of the border were forced to judge exactly how much they could support violence in the name of the faith (p. 137). The Knights of Columbus, for example, operated “a network of arms smuggling that spanned the United [End Page 188] States, Canada, and Mexico” thereby “actively supporting the Cristeros in battle” (p. 131). Other groups focused on relief efforts for arriving refugees or political activism that stuck to peaceful means. Chapter five deepens the analysis of these activists by examining the linkage between “fanáticos” and the Mexican military.

One of the major sources for this work is the archive of the Dirección General de Investigaciones Políticas y Sociales (DGIPS), the main Mexican intelligence bureaucracy until 1947, which operated in Dodson’s period as the Departamento Confidencial. These files have been open for twenty years now and have greatly enriched our understanding of numerous facets of Mexican history in the twentieth century. Indeed, practically every quality book or dissertation in the past ten years has the DGIPS as a key source. Dodson has offered something new and very useful in this book as he has excavated the personal lives of a group of Mexican agents. These insights were hard-won, deriving from hours upon hours of close reading of intelligence reports, but they help us better understand the worldview of agents on the front line. The result is “a borderlands story that places Mexican agents in an active rather than a passive role” (p. 4). The actions of U.S. and Mexican agents in the 1920s stand as a telling predicate to the protocols that developed around intelligence...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 188-190
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.