Abstract

Abstract:

Richard Ellmann termed Vera a "wretched play." In Oscar Wilde Revalued (1983), Ian Small could name only two critics gave it serious attention: Katherine Worth and Frances Miriam Reed. In Oscar Wilde Recent Research (2000), Small again found only two treatments worth mentioning: by Sos Eltis and George Rowell. Vera has come more to the fore in critical discussion, but interest continues to be outweighed by that afforded to the rest of Wilde's oeuvre, with the exception only of his unfinished works and scenarios. This article explores the reasons behind this neglect, discussing the strategies of some of the most recent, post-2000 studies of Vera. Paying closer attention to archival materials and to the broader literary (as opposed to political) context in which Vera was produced opens new ways of appreciating the significance of this work.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1559-2715
Print ISSN
0013-8339
Pages
pp. 346-375
Launched on MUSE
2020-03-16
Open Access
No
Archive Status
Will Be Archived 2021
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.