Abstract

Abstract:

This article defends an interpretation of the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā that takes it to be an attempt to undermine all existential judgments. It is then argued that introducing the Kantian idea of categories to the text's methodology provides it significant systemic support. Kant's metaphysical views are clearly distinguished from Nāgārjuna's.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1529-1898
Print ISSN
0031-8221
Pages
pp. 951-972
Launched on MUSE
2020-01-07
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.