- Museum Rhetoric: Building Civic Identity in National Spaces by M. Elizabeth Weiser
A body of critical literature on the socio-political relationships between museums and nation-building has been developing over decades. Museums are also being examined today as active rather than passive and/or reactive participants in the construction (as well as preservation and exhibition) of national and regional identities. Furthermore, museums are being studied as fertile sites for the formation of collective identities. One of the most interesting and fairly recent developments in the evolving transdisciplinary field of museum studies is the attention to the interplay of memory, history, and the individual museum experience. This entails increased emphasis on the moral, civic, and ultimately affective dimensions of that experience, insofar as it may translate into action on the part of the visitor—in and beyond the museum.
This communicative and persuasive power, its multiple object-centered strategies, and its varied modes of address to the visitor, are the subjects of M. Elizabeth Weiser's Museum Rhetoric: Building Civic Identity in National Spaces. As the author maintains in her introduction, "All museums—historical, scientific, [End Page 214] and artistic—select aspects of the world, turning them into crafted exhibits, turning life into diction" (9). Weiser's thought-provoking study attends to the intricate elements of that diction and the arguments it seeks to advance; the book examines how the explicit yet flexible tools of rhetorical analysis enable us to identify and understand the constructive, transformative, and rhetorical work of museums.
Form and subject enjoy a reciprocal relationship here. The success of Weiser's approach depends on her ability to persuade us to view museums as narrative—as well as material—spaces; the book itself thus relies on the art of persuasion, supported by a breadth of examples and a fine analytical eye. We do not find an extended treatment of any one museum or exhibition here, however, and Museum Rhetoric may prove most valuable in its presentation of abundant exempla rather than fully developed close readings of cases-in-point.
The book considers how communication proceeds—as we would expect in a work of rhetorical criticism—but, of course, the illustrative examples are primarily (not exclusively) visual: the arrangement of artifacts, the interplay between words and things, and the importance of spatial relationships. As Weiser looks at how a "story is built from the material remnants of the past" (67) she also looks at the "potential polyphony" of those material objects (69). She does not oversimplify, and some of the most interesting claims of the book involve attention to the presentation of "a national myth that is more dialogical, more flexible, and more capable of incorporating fully those ambiguities of the individual subjects making up the 'we'" (11).
Overall, Weiser strives to raise the reader's rhetorical consciousness, visual consciousness, and historical consciousness. This is a tall order. The book is heavily inflected with rhetorical theory, particularly the work of Kenneth Burke, the primary subject of her previous book, Burke, War, Words: Rhetoricizing Dramatism (University of South Carolina Press, 2008). Weiser uses the "concept of the personalizing of essence" (from Burke's A Rhetoric of Motives), for example, to explain how the individual visitor "translates the disparate events of her personal narrative into an abstract reflection, and then translates that reflection back into a narrative now larger than herself, a persuasive narrative" (101–2). She also acknowledges the contributions of Gregory Clark, whose work on the rhetorical dimensions of museums—including the National Jazz Museum in Harlem—is essential to the emerging literature on specifically museological arts of persuasion.1 Weiser also draws on other key sources in museum studies, including Eilean Hooper-Greenhill on the museum as a "communication medium rather than repository" (12); Simon Knell on the fact that "the significant object … exists more in our minds than in the vitrine" (70); and Donald Preziosi on the constructed nature of the "myth of nationality" (67). She also summons support from the work of social...