In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

BOOK REVIEWS 617 Michael Tomko. British Romanticism and the Catholic Question: Religion, His­ tory and National Identity, 1778—1829. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hamp­ shire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. Pp. xii+224. $80. The past several years have witnessed a growing interest among scholars housed in English and literature departments in the relationship between religion, especiallyJudaism and Catholicism, and British national culture of the nineteenth century. Michael Ragussis’s Figures of Conversion: TheJewish Question and English National Identity (1995), Gauri Viswanathan’s Outside the Fold: Conversion, Modernity, and Belief (1998), Mark Canuel’s Religion, Toleration, and British Writing, 1790-1870 (2002'), and Michael Wheeler’s The Old Enemies: Catholic and Protestant in Nineteenth-Century English Cul­ ture (2006) have represented some of the most searching and influential of this happily growing field, offering not only readings of specific works, au­ thors, or historical figures but also providing models and opening up criti­ cal space for further investigations. Michael Tomko’s excellent British Ro­ manticism and the Catholic Question is certainly a significant addition to that shelf, locating itself in the tradition of those earlier works, all of which it engages, and forging its own path. British Romanticism and the Catholic Question posits that the debates over the “Catholic Question,” in terms of national politics and in terms of indi­ vidual relationships between groups of writers, shaped the worldview and the literature of the Romantic era to a much greater degree than we have generally supposed. Focusing on the five decades ofalternating movements toward and away from the legislative granting ofincreased rights to Catho­ lic subjects of Britain and Ireland culminating in the 1829 passage of Cath­ olic Emancipation, the book traces the tropes of those debates in the parlia­ mentary records, the articulations of historiographical principles, the personal correspondence and memoirs, and the literature of the age. Like most of the critics he addresses, Tomko is less interested in the construction of personal identity (let alone notions of deviance or abjection that have frequently grounded analyses of minority religious cultures) than in the way that Catholicism functioned as a political category; neither Freud nor Foucault appears in the extensive (and generally very well-chosen) bibliog­ raphy, but Stephen Greenblatt does. This is a book that implicitly argues (rightly, I believe) that we need to start thinking about nineteenth-century religious experience not as a question of transgression but rather as one of the everyday. In his own words, Tomko offers “an account of the cultural and literary history of the conflict over the Catholic Question in the Romantic period; of the ways in which it forced a disturbing, self-conscious re-examination of the foundations of British national identity at a contentious time of poSiR , 51 (Winter 2012) 618 BOOK REVIEWS litical upheaval in France and Ireland; and of its central role in how the ro­ mantics viewed themselves and of how we now view the romantics” (2). He points out that not only were some of the most canonical Romantics lined up explicitly on one side or the other on the question of Catholic Emancipation—Wordsworth and Southey and Coleridge against it and Hazlitt, Hunt, Keats, Byron and Shelley (at least initially) for it—but that they communicated and argued with each other publicly and privately about it. While the specific issue of Catholic enfranchisement might seem narrow, Tomko argues that it influenced Romantic-era approaches to a wide expanse of political, historiographical, and ultimately literary ques­ tions: “The 1820s debate was a cathection of issues ranging from nation­ building, the formation of imperial identity, genre and literary politics, the narration of history, Irish-British relations, the limits of the public sphere, the abolition movement, women’s rights, the campaign for parliamentary reform and the role of religion in public life” (3). Covering all of that would be an ambitious project indeed, and Tomko wisely touches on most of those rather than following all of the forking paths (women’s rights, for example, and gender more broadly get pretty glancing attention). The book presents its case compellingly by offering such detailed and meticu­ lous evidence for the claims that it does focus on—and by presenting plau­ sible hints of the broader...

pdf

Share