Nietzsche's On the Genealogy of Morality (GM) is now a recognized masterpiece, but there are widely varying views about its historical aims and methods. One point of agreement among scholars is that it serves a critical function, as Nietzsche himself declares that we need a critique of moral values and a knowledge of the conditions and circumstances out of which they grew, under which they evolved and changed. It is taken to be strikingly successful in this respect. Yet a genealogy must serve not only to critique but also to transform social phenomena—otherwise, it is a destructive and potentially nihilistic tool. I argue GM is also a constructive project by showing that its historical approach is best understood as developed from Nietzsche's earlier theory of history. "The Utility and Liability of History for Life" contains a theory of historical interpretation that elucidates GM.


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 292-309
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.