In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • They Said No to Nixon: Republicans Who Stood Up to the President's Abuses of Power by Michael Koncewicz
  • Sarah Katherine Mergel (bio)
They Said No to Nixon: Republicans Who Stood Up to the President's Abuses of Power. By Michael Koncewicz. (Oakland: University of California Press, 2018. Pp. vii, 225. $29.95 cloth; $29.95 ebook)

Since Richard Nixon's resignation in 1974, scholars have explored the consequences of the abuse of power within his administration. In They Said No to Nixon, Michael Koncewicz, the Cold War Collections Specialist [End Page 250] at New York University's Tamiment Library and Robert F. Wagner Labor Archives, highlights the unique role of the Republicans who refused to politicize their roles under Nixon. Koncewicz argues Nixon was unsuccessful in his effort to institutionalize the abuse of power, in part, because of those civil servants. Simultaneously, the author demonstrates the perceived threat to the non-partisan culture of the federal bureaucracy underscored their resistance while also arguing that Nixon's attempts to politicize the bureaucracy negated his historical image as a moderate.

After a lengthy introduction, Koncewicz focuses on instances where Republicans in Nixon's administration helped to forestall his plans. In the first chapter, he discusses how Johnnie Walters impeded the president's attempts to politicize the Internal Revenue Service. Specifically, he refused, with the backing of Treasury Secretary George Schultz, to conduct audits of people on Nixon's enemies list. In the second chapter, Koncewicz examines how Kenneth Dam, William Morrill, and Paul O'Neill, assistant directors at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), blocked the president's efforts to minimize the influence of the establishment by redirecting federal grants away from Ivy League universities. Simultaneously, he explores Nixon's cultural populism or efforts to encourage voters to distrust the elite. Here again, Koncewicz shows Schultz, the former director of the OMB, playing a role in the resistance efforts.

In the third and fourth chapters, Koncewicz sketches the rocky relationship Elliot Richardson had with Nixon and then looks at his role in Watergate. Richardson's long career in the civil service brought a certain level of credibility and authority to the Nixon cabinet, and yet, his ties to the establishment "made him an uneasy fit within the administration" (p. 115). During his tenure at Health, Education and Welfare, Richardson quietly took positions that countered Nixon's efforts to move domestic policy in a more conservative direction. Despite concerns about Richardson's loyalty, in 1973, Nixon selected him as attorney general because he had the kind of reputation the public would trust given the Watergate revelations. In his new role, Richardson sought to find a middle ground between the position of the special prosecutor and the position of the White House regarding the release of the audio tapes. However, given the failure to find a compromise, he opted to resign rather than fire Archibald Cox. Richardson believed he had made a commitment to Congress to support the special prosecutor's efforts in his confirmation hearings. Resignation was the only course of action for him, but the same was not true for Robert Bork, the solicitor general who eventually fired the special prosecutor. [End Page 251]

Koncewicz seeks to use "the White House tapes and other recently released documents to explore the depths of the Nixon presidency" while also providing enough evidence from those sources to suggest scholars should not ignore Nixon's abuse of power in favor of focusing on the positive aspects of his presidency (p. 22). In keeping with these goals, the author draws heavily from the documentary record of the Nixon administration including internal memos and recordings of conversations as well as the papers and memoirs of the people who figured prominently in the book, though the use of the tapes proves most noteworthy. For example, Koncewicz describes a conversation from September 15, 1972, in which the president expressed dismay over Johnnie Walters's unwillingness to attack his political opponents, with Nixon commenting, "How come we haven't pulled [George] McGovern's file on his income tax?" (p. 59). The author also points to an exchange from May 15, 1972, in which Nixon berated National Security...

pdf

Share