Abstract

Abstract:

This article analyzes counterintuitive uses of Walt Whitman by four contemporary US writers. Chris Adrian's Gob's Grief, Sherman Alexie's "Defending Walt Whitman," Andrea Dworkin's Mercy, and Michael Cunningham's Specimen Days break from common practice by displaying ambivalence or hostility toward Whitman, questioning his symbolic legacy rather than claiming heritage with him. I argue that their use of Whitman shows that the writers I discuss recognize that the form of twentieth and twenty-first century society presents philosophical and ethical problems with the re-use of longstanding liberal shibboleths, often associated with figures like Whitman. I compare Whitman's treatment by these authors to more conventional narrative uses, in which authors link their characters and narratives to a romantic American identity that Whitman symbolizes. The revisionist Whitman we see in Adrian, Alexie, Dworkin, and Cunningham interrogate this continual turning to Whitman, demonstrating important tensions within the contemporary US's self-conception.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1542-4286
Print ISSN
0093-3139
Pages
pp. 829-859
Launched on MUSE
2019-10-15
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.