Abstract

Abstract:

The language we use often has profound implications for our perception of categories, and those within them. In this article, I suggest that there is an entire class of utterances which are misleading and unhelpful when used to describe mental illness: generics. Generics are statements that describe kinds or categories rather than individuals. I suggest that generics about mental illness can propagate insidious forms of social stereotyping, much in the same way Leslie (2013) describes. However, they also encourage us to treat the categories they name in quintessential terms: that is, as deeply similar and unified. This is liable to generate misconceptions, and lead to beliefs about mental illness which do not cohere with clinical reality and contribute to misunderstanding and stigma. As such, I suggest that we should avoid using generics to talk about mental illness categories, and instead use quantified utterances. Where we hear generics, we should challenge them via the mechanism of metalinguistic blocking (Haslanger, 2011).

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1086-3303
Print ISSN
1071-6076
Pages
pp. 261-275
Launched on MUSE
2019-09-11
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.