Abstract

ABSTRACT:

This article relates to international relations literature, which explores the domestic conditions under which governments are more likely to comply with their international human rights commitments. Emerging literature has emphasized the role of "state capacities" as a key variable in explaining the gap between commitment and compliance, taking the willingness of states for granted and therefore not exploring it empirically in an explicit fashion. Using Mexico as a "crucial" case study, this article's main argument is that while it is true that attempts to explain poor compliance must take into account "capacities," they must also include "willingness" as a central explanatory factor. Beyond exploring the case of Mexico, this article contributes to the development of theories of compliance with international human rights norms and to the conceptualization and operationalization of the notions of state capacities and state willingness.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1085-794X
Print ISSN
0275-0392
Pages
pp. 441-464
Launched on MUSE
2019-05-30
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.