In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Queer Identities and Politics in Germany: A History, 1880–1945 by Clayton Whisnant
  • Marti Lybeck
Clayton Whisnant. Queer Identities and Politics in Germany: A History, 1880–1945.
Harrington Park Press, 2016. 348 pp. US$40 (Paperback).
ISBN 978-1-939594-09-9.

Clayton Whisnant's survey successfully fills a long-recognized need in the literature on sexualities in Germany for a broad overview of the emergence [End Page 190] of homosexual identity that is accessible to the general reader. Closing a forty-year gap since the publication of James Steakley's The Homosexual Emancipation Movement in Germany, Whisnant effectively synthesizes the rich material historians have been producing since the 1990s. As the title suggests, he has chosen to concentrate on the more publicly visible aspects of homosexuality. Identity, as Whisnant uses it, means articulation of concepts of the sexual self that became visible in literary, theoretical, or promotional contexts. In keeping with his stated goal of avoiding academic argumentation and theoretical analysis, this is not a history of subjectivities, the complexities of desire, the nature of relationships, or the fi ne grain of everyday life (5). The text integrates primary-source quotations frequently and skilfully, allowing readers to gain insights into the culture of bars and organizations, as well as the conceptualizations and representations deployed by a variety of writers. Most prominently, the book is a story of a struggle over how to define and manage a new type of individual.

The role of scientific literature in explaining same-sex and gender-nonconforming behaviour takes centre stage for much of the book. The reason for its prominence is not only science's importance in identity formation and political advocacy but also the book's culmination in the Nazi persecutions. Here, in spite of his preference for narrative over analysis, Whisnant concludes with a detailed consideration of why as well as exactly how persecution of homosexual men fit into Nazi eugenic and racial construction of the Volksgemeinschaft.

Whisnant does not completely exclude historiography and conceptual debates, instead placing these in explanatory sections of the text, guiding readers new to this material through the various ways scholars have interpreted the legacy of Magnus Hirschfeld, for example, or the notion of Weimar decadence (38–39, 200). Each of the six chapters includes generous reference to scholars' more focused studies. The first two chapters fill in the emergence of a medicalized concept of homosexuality and the scandals that helped to spread the notion more broadly in the pre-First World War German-speaking world. Three chapters are devoted primarily to the Weimar era—one on the emergence of what Whisnant terms "scenes" in bars, cabaret, and organizations; one on cultural representation, from Thomas Mann to the film Mädchen in Uniform to the photography of Wilhelm von Gloeden to popular newsletters; and one on the politics of the repeal of the notorious Paragraph 175 of the Criminal Code, which laid out the punishments for male-male sexual contact. In addition to the final chapter on the Nazi era, Whisnant adds a brief epilogue following up on his themes for the postwar period.

The book is especially strong in its even-handed discussion of the variety of identities produced by the category of homosexuality and the resulting fracturing of organizing and politics. Going back to Steakley, historians have recognized the contentious split between men, like Hirschfeld, who explained homosexuality as a biological phenomenon and those who were drawn to a more cultural, sometimes termed "masculinist," direction, loosely grouped [End Page 191] around Adolf Brand. Whisnant breaks up this duality, discussing the splits and tensions within each group, as well as figures who did not fit into either camp. He includes social clubs and their publications, seldom analyzed thoroughly in English-language histories, as a key element for the creation of a queer community that was socially broader, yet also obsessed with maintaining a respectable public image of homosexuality. Whisnant also traces the fracturing that occurred within the campaign to repeal Paragraph 175. Making this painful history visible is important for Whisnant's purpose of giving contemporary queer readers a fuller sense of community formation and political struggle in the past (9, 254).

Some...

pdf

Share