- On Caryl Churchill and Dull Gret
The impact Caryl Churchill has had on contemporary drama is enormous, incalculable, but let me start with my own small frame.
I am watching my mother, who is an actress, play Dull Gret (a woman in a Bruegel painting) in Top Girls, at the Piven theatre workshop in Evanston, Illinois. For most of the first act, my mother has been mostly silent; she eats and occasionally says “potatoes” in a Dutch accent. But at the end of the act, she stands on the table and delivers an extraordinary aria, full of grief and rage:
We come to hell through a big mouth. Hell’s black and red. It’s like the village where I come from . . . There’s a big devil sat on a roof with a big hole in his arse and he’s scooping stuff out of it with a big ladle and it’s falling down on us, and it’s money, so a lot of the women stop and get some. But most of us is fighting the devils. My baby, a soldier run her through with a sword. I’d had enough, I was mad, I hate the bastards. Oh we give them devils such a beating.
And this monologue, delivered by my mother, made me cry. I felt, for the first time, in my body, what Caryl Churchill’s work could do. Her formal genius was managing to create a structure in which many women from different historical epochs can share a theatrical present, and then become other women in the [End Page 43] present in the second act. The form made you think, and then suddenly, when you least expect it, you are weeping.
A few years later, I was a young unknown playwright, and someone gave me a free ticket to Blue Heart at the Brooklyn Academy of Music. I watch, astonished. Nearing the end of the play, the characters are saying the utterances “blue kettle, blue kettle, bl k kk kkk” and I understood every word they were saying. This was an epiphany. It was as though Churchill had created a theatrical proof—that language was only the icing on the cake, but also decisively created action. The utterance was parted from the action, but still decipherable.
Then came Far Away at New York Theatre Workshop, featuring a young Marin Ireland and the great Frances McDormand. After the terrifying minimalist opening scene came a glorious parade of hats, reminding me that Churchill is a master of surprise. The hat parade had a grotesque logic and was also completely unexpected. It was brilliant spectacle with a grim political and existential undertone.
Years later, I end up working with two of Caryl Churchill’s long-time collaborators—the extraordinary and very different directors Les Waters and Mark Wing-Davey. I learn from Les about minimalism, about the unsaid, how it glows on the edges of the stage—not subtext exactly, but as the unsayable. I learn from Mark Wing-Davey about the Joint Stock process, and how to learn from actors—treating them as full intellectual subjects with their own full curiosities—during a rehearsal process. And I feel that these gifts are also from Churchill.
At some point I was able to meet this hero of mine. We had lunch. I learned that we both have three children, we both have celiac disease, and we both throw the I Ching. And that she is every bit as brilliant in person as she is on the page. That Caryl Churchill managed to raise three children and reinvent form with every play she’s ever written gave me courage. That she was kind as well as fiercely brilliant made me love her even more than I had when I knew her only from the page.
Now that I am a teacher, at the Yale School of Drama, Churchill is almost always on my syllabus. Unlike some writers, her plays never fade with time, but seem to get etched ever more clearly into the canon, belonging as much as ever to the next generation of her collaborators. [End Page 44]
SARAH RUHL is a...