Abstract

Abstract:

Child support payments extend separated fathers' male breadwinning role across households, likely fuelling fathers' perceptions of "unfairness". By examining fathers' written submissions to an Australian inquiry, we examine fathers' claims of unfairness, which were expressed in terms of gender inequality. Here, we show how fathers adopted a gender equality discourse that left intact the existing gender order. Through expectations for equal treatment, men claimed the child support system would produce equality of outcomes, namely, eliminating the redistributive need for child support payments. In doing so, fathers' qualified support for gender equality advantaged men as payers while further entrenching gender inequity.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1468-2893
Print ISSN
1072-4745
Pages
pp. 164-187
Launched on MUSE
2019-04-02
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.