Haunted by Chaos: China's Grand Strategy from Mao Zedong to Xi Jinping by Sulmaan Wasif Khan (review)

This is an ambitious book by an author who knows his subject matter well, having in addition a knack for animating diplomatic minutia with much verve and vitality. The aim here is quite explicitly to harness whatever one can glean from archival sources on China's diverse international relations so as to offer fresh insights into the thinking patterns informing decision-making by the leaders of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The book structure and arguments are very straightforward, and are therefore likely to appeal to specialists and popular audiences alike.

In his introduction, Khan suggests that while economic policy shifted over time, and even though personalities at the helm varied, the CCP's "overarching goal remained the same" (p. 3). Certainly, the notion of acute Party insecurity comes across time and again in the chapters to come. One assumes it had informed the title choice too. However, beyond the Mao era (1949–1976), that insecurity seems to be largely inferred from the very same Party documentary compilations that, in Khan's own judgment, can turn "mendacious" at times (p. 5).

In chapter 1, Khan ably highlights how Mao's peasant-like shrewdness helped pave his way to the top of the CCP in the face of USSR misgivings. His assessment here is quite complimentary, especially when depicting Chiang Kai-shek's contending nation-building project as tainted by "fascism" (p. 12) and corruption. Nevertheless, he accepts Rana Mitter's view that the CCP contribution to the war effort against Japan during 1931–1945 was small.

In his words, Mao "… sought to fight the Japanese as he had fought the Nationalists: in a patient, elaborate dance across China, which would end with Japan exhausted" (p. 17). Mao would remain ineffably grateful to the Japanese aggressors for helping debilitate the KMT (p. 23). But Mao's pitch to Muslim and Mongol minorities in the Northeast to join the fray against the Japanese, and later on against the KMT, did not prove very effective.

In view of Stalin's ambivalence toward China, Mao comes across as pragmatic in engaging with American emissaries before the Korean War. Unlike Frank Dikötter, Khan otherwise seems to believe that after liberation, Mao strove to minimize the execution of so-called KMT sympathizers in the countryside. He shrugs off Mao's reckless voluntarism with a characteristically terse understatement; after all, Mao was "… no economic genius" (p. 32).

Chapter 2 covers the later Mao era. There is enlightening new information here, gleaned from the Chinese Foreign Office archives. The evidence in Khan's judgement goes against the grain of conventional wisdom. Namely, in 1950, far from being set up by Stalin, Mao is deemed to have been galvanized by Peng Dehuai to attack the UN expeditionary force in Korea with only very limited assurances of logistical back-up from Moscow (p. 59).

By contrast, Khan's treatment of the Sino-Soviet split, the souring of relations with Delhi, and the American war in Vietnam recalls earlier studies. His contribution here seems to boil down to highlighting the Kazakh exodus from Xinjiang into Soviet central Asia in 1962. The Chinese saw this as loss of face "… implying that they had failed to provide their people" (p. 93), and demanded that the USSR send the Kazakhs back. One might perhaps find the Chinese reaction surprising, given policy trends in Xinjiang at present. Part of the explanation surely derives from the CCP enduring preoccupation with ethnic harmony. This is hinted at in the book when, for example, discussing Mao's complex attitude to the Genghis Khan historical legacy (p. 98).

Khan's provocative argument at the end of the chapter is that Mao had in fact laid the groundwork for Deng Xiaoping's economic miracle despite having decried the former's economic incompetence earlier on. Chapter 3 is then broadly devoted...