In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Wild Things: The Joy of Reading Children’s Literature as an Adult by Bruce Handy, and: Wild Things! Acts of Mischief in Children’s Literature by Betsy Bird, Julie Danielson, and Peter D. Sieruta
  • Jan Susina (bio)
Wild Things: The Joy of Reading Children’s Literature as an Adult. By Bruce Handy. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2017.
Wild Things! Acts of Mischief in Children’s Literature. By Betsy Bird, Julie Danielson, and Peter D. Sieruta. New York: Candlewick Press, 2014.

These two books have more in common than their titles, give or take an exclamation point. Both are engaging and lively overviews of children’s literature written for general readers. They are not academic works, nor [End Page 111] are they intended to be. They are published for a wider, nonacademic audience: adults, including parents, who continue to read children’s and adolescent texts. These readers are interested in additional information about the authors and desire a fuller understanding of the cultural and historical context of the books and how these texts have been interpreted.

A contributing editor to Vanity Fair, Bruce Handy explains that the inspiration for his Wild Things was his becoming a parent, which enabled him not only to revisit some of his childhood favorites but also to reread them more critically. Handy realizes that some children’s books age well and others not so well. (Stop me if you’ve heard this before.) He spends most of his time discussing established children’s authors and illustrators: Margaret Wise Brown, Dr. Seuss, Maurice Sendak, Laura Ingalls Wilder, C. S. Lewis, Beverly Cleary, E. B. White. He recounts that the first book that he read on his own was Seuss’s Ten Apples Up on Top!. When asked his favorite children’s book, Handy acknowledges that despite countless readings, Green Eggs and Ham always makes him smile.

Most of the books that Handy considers are by American authors of the twentieth century, although he occasionally goes back in time to discuss the fairy tales of Charles Perrault and Jakob and Wilhelm Grimm, along with Louisa May Alcott and Mark Twain. The majority of the writers with whom he engages are white, save for a brief discussion of Mildred Taylor and picture books about Rosa Parks. And while he considers Charles Ingalls the single most competent character in American literature (210), Handy seems unaware of the controversy surrounding Wilder’s representation of Native Americans and African Americans in the Little House series. Issues of race or diversity in terms of characters or authorship of children’s texts are rarely addressed. LGBTQ issues don’t appear. For a re-exploration of children’s literature, this Wild Things is relatively tame and mainstream. Handy has done some research into children’s literature, citing Leonard Marcus, Alison Lurie, Jack Zipes, Maria Tatar, and Seth Lerer. But more often than not, he tends to draw his information from articles that appear in The New Yorker rather than from academic journals such as Children’s Literature, ChLA Quarterly, The Lion and the Unicorn, and Children’s Literature in Education.

What is troubling about this volume is that it reveals the gap between what scholars writing on children’s literature are doing and the books about children’s literature that are accessible to and read by general readers. Most volumes written by children’s literature scholars tend to be aimed at other children’s literature scholars. The increasingly high cost of academic books—a problem not limited to this field—creates another hurdle for general readers and reduces the availability of such titles in libraries. There is a growing audience of adults reading children’s books who would value some additional context and critical evaluation of the books that they are enjoying. A recent essay on highlighted “The 12 Books from Childhood You ‘Crave’ as Adults, [End Page 112] According to People on Reddit.” In the article, Maddy Foley reported that the post “Do you ever get cravings to read books from your childhood even though you’re older now?” received 2,100 replies within twenty-four hours. The Atlantic’s Web site featured a similar essay by Emma Court...


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 111-115
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.