Textures of the Anthropocene: Grain Vapor Ray by Katrin Klingan, et al. (review)

Now that the Anthropocene, the world as disastrously defined by humanity, has found such a solid place in today’s thought, it is useful to return to a publication that has possibly not been given the attention that it deserves. Although the times we live in are no doubt daunting, we could also call them exciting times due to their particular challenges. The incredible intellectual candy store Textures of the Anthropocene makes that much clear, both through its wonderful collection of texts but also in its design. To start with the latter, each of the four volumes has its own identity through a different use of paper. Where the three main volumes all have a white cover, the “manual” is bright yellow and relatively thin compared to the others. Thus, while reading one not only has an intellectual but also a sensual experience that is quite important to understand the main idea behind this publication. Being in the Anthropocene is amongst other things realizing and respecting the agency of the nonhuman. Different qualities of paper, from grainy and light to glossy and heavy, thus add to the information that is communicated.

These textures can also be seen to allude to geographical layers that are further enhanced by the angles of approach of each of the volumes. Grain, Vapor and Ray talk respectively about the particulate, the volatile and the radiant. The setup is to bring various texts from throughout history and from different disciplines into conversation with contemporary comments. This results in a thoroughly and much-needed transdisciplinary undertaking. Although the volumes are accompanied and not so much introduced by a “manual,” the full publication as such is certainly not one, or at least not in any traditional sense. It does not intend to offer clear instructions of how to tackle the consequences of the Anthropocene. What the manual text by Klingan et al. in the yellow volume makes beautifully clear is the importance of imagination and storytelling if we want to find solutions or a way out. Narratives are world-making. Klingan et al. refer to various authors to make their point, from Hannah Arendt to Walter Benjamin, Henri Bergson to John Dewey, but especially Michel Serres. Where Bergson previously pointed to the fact that “all division of matter into independent bodies with absolutely determined outlines is an artificial division” (Manual, p. 11), Serres introduced the angel of flux (Manual, p. 16), connected to the inherent viscosity of Earth. Serres also states: “Indeed, it is worth telling the (his)tory of a small, local, singular element, that of an atom, a grain of sand, a thin layer of fluid somewhere in the middle of this violent zone where various flows intermingle” (Manual, p. 24). Klingan et al. connect these ideas with the mutability and transformation of a history of imagination.

Although each volume is of an extreme richness, the Ray volume in particular brings everything together. Serres fittingly ends this volume, but equally forms a beginning to the whole undertaking. In a response to Athanasius Kircher’s Mundus Subterraneus (1664), Serres replaces Plato’s possibly overused cave with that of Jules Verne from his The Southern Star Mystery. Whereas Plato’s cave is mainly dark, with just one light source, Verne’s is a dazzle of light, textures and colors and thus points to a different and potentially greater kind of richness. Philosophy meets fiction in this example, but if there’s one thing to learn from Textures of the Anthropocene it is that all things mingle in a mixture from which new things can evolve. We used our imagination to get into the situation, as John Dewey would name the Anthropocene (Manual, p. 18); we can also use our imagination to potentially get out of it or find another way of dealing with it, even though we are at a point of no return. As we finally have become human by recognizing...