In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Democracy’s Infrastructure: techno-politics and protest after apartheid by Antina von Schnitzler
  • Idalina Baptista
Antina von Schnitzler, Democracy’s Infrastructure: techno-politics and protest after apartheid. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press (hb US$80/£62–978 0 6911 7077 0; pb US$27.95/£22–978 0 6911 7078 7). 2016, 238 pp.

In the preface to Aramis, or, The Love of Technology, Bruno Latour asks whether it may be possible to turn ‘a technological object into the central character of a narrative, restoring to literature the vast territories it should never have given up–namely, science and technology’ (pp. vii). In Democracy’s Infrastructure, anthropologist Antina von Schnitzler does just that: she turns the prepaid meter into the central character of interconnected stories about the ‘service delivery protests’ taking place in post-apartheid South Africa. Through a historically informed ethnographic study of technological artefacts and infrastructures, the author provides an intellectually stimulating entry point into the materiality of democracy and the political in South Africa and elsewhere. Her work adds to the growing scholarship that foregrounds infrastructure as a political terrain, not just as a substrate for political action or a conduit for grand state narratives of modernization and development. Theoretically, the book is strongly engaged with Foucault’s biopolitics and various strands of science and technology studies. It is of obvious interest to South Africanists, but also to those interested in how technology mediates everyday experiences of state, citizenship and democracy.

Von Schnitzler brings her ethnographic focus to bear on how the adoption of pre-payment in South African townships becomes a political terrain for the contestation and negotiation of state–society relationships. She examines the everyday administrative interactions around the provision of basic services such as water and electricity, a terrain one step removed from the normative domains of liberal politics. Central to those negotiations and contestations are differing notions of citizenship, civic virtues, moral obligations, and forms of sociality that oppose residents of townships to the administrative state. Von Schnitzler traces the differing notions back to broader ideologies and practices of colonialism, apartheid, anti-apartheid struggle, liberal democracy and neoliberalism. By focusing on the prepaid meter, she explores how questions about payment for basic services relate to (unfulfilled) promises of citizenship in post-apartheid South Africa. Overall, the book offers a critique of the possibilities of liberal democracy in neoliberal times, where precarity and inequality have arguably been normalized.

This theoretical and empirical focus is well articulated in Chapter 1. Chapter 2 offers a historical account of how the apartheid regime drew on neoliberal ideas to craft pragmatic responses to the various problems it faced in governing urban black populations in the late 1970s. Chapter 3 discusses the historical connections between contemporary anti-prepayment protests and strategies of non-payment first rehearsed during the anti-apartheid struggle. Chapter 4 introduces the history of prepayment devices, travelling from Victorian Britain all the way to late-apartheid South Africa. The chapter explores how every technology is inscribed with moral and political projects and aspirations for its users, which is why technology can become a political terrain for the negotiation of those same projects and aspirations. Chapter 5 examines the practices of ‘living prepaid’ through a focus on the metrological regimes and calculative practices of water provision and consumption through a prepaid meter. Chapter 6 discusses how metrological regimes become entangled in global discourses on human rights in the court battles waged by activists against prepayment. The conclusion summarizes the argument for infrastructure as a novel empirical object and epistemological vantage point into South Africa’s ‘transition’ to democracy, as well as a metaphor for the exploration of the various dimensions of democracy in contemporary times. [End Page 636]

While I highly recommend this book, two main apprehensions emerged as I read it. The first relates to how wedded the author seems to be to the pervasive powers of neoliberal thought and its translation and appropriation into local forms of biopolitics. I side here with those scholars who are increasingly sceptical about neoliberal ideas having such totalizing power in global South contexts. The second apprehension concerns the underlying judgement against prepayment as mediator of a state...

pdf

Share