Abstract

summary:

Antibiotics have played a significant yet ambivalent role in Western livestock husbandry. Mass introduced to agriculture to boost animal production and reduce feed consumption in the early 1950s, agricultural antibiotics were soon accused of selecting for bacterial resistance, causing residues and enabling bad animal welfare. The dilemma posed by agricultural antibiotic regulation persists to this day. This essay traces the history of British antibiotic regulation from 1953 to the influential 1969 Swann report. It highlights the role that individual experts using bacteriophage typing played in warning about the mass selection for bacterial resistance on farms and the response of a corporatist system, whose traditional laissez-faire arrangements struggled to cope with the risk posed by bacterial resistance. In addition to contextualizing the Swann report's origins, the essay also discusses the report's fate and implications for current antibiotic regulation.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1086-3176
Print ISSN
0007-5140
Pages
pp. 317-350
Launched on MUSE
2018-06-28
Open Access
Yes
Creative Commons
CC-BY
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.