Abstract

Abstract:

China's search for energy security has attracted growing research interest over the past decade, where the main focus has been on both China's ability to meet its daunting oil requirements and the effects that its consumption and quest for oil abroad has on global energy security. This article attempts to explain China's state-led approach to energy security and evaluate its effectiveness. In doing so, it provides a counter-argument to the conventional scholarly view that China suffers from a dearth of oil state capacity. This prevailing view is informed by an influential, yet arguably outdated, model of the Chinese policy process called fragmented authoritarianism (FA). An alternative model, known as bureaucratic authoritarianism (BA), is shown to provide a more compelling explanation of the interplay of elite and bureaucratic power within the oil sector. It acknowledges that the central Party-state is defined by a steep power gradient, which has been strengthened in recent years, especially in the strategic sectors of the Chinese economy (oil sector is at the forefront). A more optimistic appraisal of China's oil state capacity that traces institutional change throughout the reform era, it shows that capacity has improved over time, as is reflected in better policy outcomes.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
0219-8614
Print ISSN
0219-7472
Pages
pp. 107-128
Launched on MUSE
2018-03-15
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.