In All’s Well That Ends Well , Shakespeare imagines a common enough situation—someone you love, if ambivalently, will never love you—and in doing so suggests how unrequited love might become an art, a practice of sustaining relationship with those who prefer no relationship whatsoever and who might not merit our investment to begin with. How, Shakespeare asks, can you have a relationship with someone whose heart is corrupt and who, anyway, would prefer to flee? Shakespeare’s answer: by making scenes, and, it turns out, by being a masochist. Helena’s art, I argue, indeed looks forward to the art of masochism as outlined by Gilles Deleuze. For Deleuze, the works of Sacher-Masoch outline an art defined not in the familiar Freudian sense, by finding pleasure in pain, but by a masochistic constellation manifested in scenes of disavowal, suspense, and waiting.


Additional Information

Print ISSN
pp. 215-240
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.