Abstract

The argument in this paper is that the position of Schneiderman, Jecker, and Jonsen (2017) suffers from the very flaws of which they accuse the Multiorganization Policy Statement, and that all the ethical and conceptual arguments speak in favor of the collaborative, deliberativist position that underlies the Multiorganization Statement. That position is that we should abandon self-sealing definitions of futility, which disguise the value judgments inherent in them, in favor of the evolving, collaborative process of decision-making.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1529-8795
Print ISSN
0031-5982
Pages
pp. 408-414
Launched on MUSE
2018-01-25
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.