In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Fostering on the Farm: Child Placement in the Rural Midwest by Megan Birk
  • Jennifer Robin Terry (bio)
Fostering on the Farm: Child Placement in the Rural Midwest. By Megan Birk. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2015. viii + 256 pp. Cloth $55.

Megan Birk's Fostering on the Farm: Child Placement in the Rural Midwest expands what we know about the care of dependent children in the United States from the 1870s through the 1920s. This regional study of the practice of placing children with farm families joins such notable works as Linda Gordon's The Great Arizona Orphan Abduction (1999), Marilyn Irvin Holt's The Orphan Train: Placing Out in America (1992), and Stephen O'Connor's Orphan Trains: The Story of Charles Loring Brace and the Children He Saved and Failed (2001). But Birk does not merely repeat the now familiar story of the well-intentioned though misguided eastern reformers who sent urban children west by train to begin life anew on western farms. Rather, she traces the rise and decline of farm placements through a regional lens, which casts new light on the practice, revealing that local child welfare reformers, and eventually state boards, "did more in the long run" to influence modern dependency care than did transnational emigration schemes (3).

In chapter 1, Birk provides an essential explanation of how America's romance with agrarianism informed the nation's psyche and shaped child welfare policy in the late nineteenth century. This lays the foundation for understanding the philosophy that informed child welfare reformers' decisions. Because reformers (and Americans generally) held farmers in high esteem and judged rural life to be superior to city living, they believed that any farm provided better, more wholesome arrangements in which to raise children than non-familial institutions could afford. This blind faith in a rural ideal motivated the early orphan trains and influenced official child placement policies from the 1870s through the 1890s. Moreover, the belief that farm labor instilled qualities necessary for children to grow into healthy, productive, self-sufficient adults led a number of midwestern charity homes and asylums to run their [End Page 121] own farms. Nonetheless, reformers considered placement on freeholders' farms a more desirable option because they believed that farm families would welcome and nurture their young charges in a way that institutions could not.

What becomes obvious through chapters 2 and 3 is that by and large, midwestern farmers saw child placement primarily as a source of free labor. Institutional records and correspondence between placement agents, farmers, and children reveal that this often meant that children who were placed on farms were not incorporated into the family unit but rather encountered overwork, abuse, neglect, and sometimes death. Many children also endured perpetual instability as some farmers routinely returned them to institutions after the harvest or anytime they were deemed a burden or liability. Thus, the reality of child placement was more akin to indentured servitude than the virtuous farm-family ideal. These chapters are perhaps the most powerful in getting at farmers' motivations and the lived experiences of these unfortunate children.

Chapters 4 and 5 trace the transition from free farm placement to modern dependency care policies. One of the strengths of this study is in the way that Birk communicates the complexity and unevenness of the various schemes that were employed for the care of orphaned, abandoned, and otherwise dependent children. She explains that although farm placements increased in the last decades of the nineteenth century, they never entirely replaced institutions. But because of the connection and fluidity between local institutions and placement homes, child welfare agents were the first to see through the veil of the agrarian myth as they dealt with failed placements and broken children. As midwestern county boards, institutions, and states attempted to systematize placements and increase supervision at the local level, they began to reconsider the wisdom of farm placements. These local efforts preceded federal moves and helped to inform Progressive policies that led to a modern system of dependency care, entailing direct aid to families, court monitoring, and paid foster care.

Meticulously researched, Fostering on the Farm complicates the history of dependent child placement and provides...

pdf

Share