In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Appendices

forms of violence, religion and violence, nonviolence, commitment to peace, empathetic understanding, appreciation of religious diversity

I. Thinking Together: Message on Religion and Violence Eckerd College, St. Petersburg, Florida, February 8–12, 2002

We, members of five religious traditions—Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism—came together with deep concern about the growing violence in the world today. Our own traditions give us our ethical values and offer us a vision of peaceful co-existence predicated upon justice and harmony with the earth. We are conscious of the need to be self-critical and to go beyond a discourse shaped by narrow political, national, economic, or military objectives. We endeavor to go beyond religious idealism and explore concrete modes of expression and action.

A. Faces of Violence

In attempting to identify the many faces of violence, we are conscious of the complexity of the phenomenon and the need to develop deeper understandings of it. Identifying the different faces of violence will help us to discover relevant and effective ways of overcoming them. In accounting for the sources of violence, some of our traditions see it as an integral part of nature, while others locate it in human greed, hatred, and ignorance.

The following are some of the faces of violence that we identify: (1) Physical Violence, including warfare, the use of brute force such as battering and domestic abuse, or terrorism by individuals, groups, or states. (2) Political Violence, such as when laws are enacted that militate against the recognition of each person’s dignity, worth, and equality with another. (3) State-sponsored Violence, such as extra-judicial killings, torture, and detention/incarceration without due legal process. (4) Structural Violence, which is built into social, political, and economic structures such as caste, patriarchy, etc. (5) Ecological Violence, which is the destruction of the environment [End Page 187] resulting from irresponsible use of natural resources. (6) Liberative Violence, which is when individuals or groups—as a last resort—seek recourse to violence to respond to the above-listed forms of violence so as to achieve liberation from oppression.

B. The Relation between Religion and Violence

Religious traditions can be resources for building peace. At the same time, religious communities often play a role in advocating and justifying violence. In the face of structural violence, religious traditions should help us to overcome the lust for power, control, and possession of material goods that are the driving impulses of violence and violent systems. The following are some of the ways in which we characterize the relationship between violence and religion:

Silence: Religious communities often maintain silence in the face of violence. There are many reasons for such silence, including the concern for the survival of their own communities and structures. Some may also see their role as helping their adherents feel satisfied with the status quo and with their own material prosperity, without a concern for the marginalized.

Sanctification: Religious communities justify the use of violence by the state or extra-state entities or by other agencies. Examples of this would be when a religious tradition attaches itself to the militaristic objectives of the state or the textual/canonical legitimization of violence against women.

Expansion: Religious communities use violence for purposes of spreading themselves or of ensuring their own growth.

Images of God: Some religious traditions have violent images of the Divine, which may have problematic implications for the self-understanding of their believers.

Images of Self: Religious traditions promote violence by framing the worth of their adherents in terms of the lesser worth of others.

While the above list exposes some of the problematic aspects of the relationship between religion and violence, the following list points to constructive forms of engagement:

Unmasking/Opposing: Religious communities have played a role in opposing violence both within their own community and when others are injured. [End Page 188]

Models of Nonviolence: Each religious tradition has also had significant individuals and groups whose lives testify to the peaceful impulses in religion.

Limiting Violence: Religions have often played a role in checking the levels of violence or “humanizing” it. In most of our traditions, limited use of violence is permitted for the defense of the good...

pdf

Share