Abstract

Abstract:

The personal accounts of people with psychiatric diagnoses are increasingly being used in research in the United Kingdom, the United States, and other Western countries. Whether these studies entail face-to-face interviews and subsequent work with transcripts or they are based on published first-person accounts, they give rise to similar concerns and dilemmas. Sensitive to the power divisions inherent in psychiatric diagnosis and treatment, this paper explores the role of consent and the significance of the researcher’s identity alongside issues of ultimate interpretative authority and research ownership. Revisiting several narrative studies in the fields of psychiatry and mental health, this paper focuses on the epistemic implications of what Mike Oliver calls the ‘social relations of research production’ and argues that the research task of making meaning of experience must be shared. The potential contributions of survivor-controlled research and Arthur Frank’s dialogical narrative analysis are highlighted in this context.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1086-3303
Print ISSN
1071-6076
Pages
pp. 215-228
Launched on MUSE
2017-02-15
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.