In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Ben Shahn’s New Deal Murals: Jewish Identity in the American Scene by Diana L. Linden
  • Josh Lambert (bio)
Ben Shahn’s New Deal Murals: Jewish Identity in the American Scene. By Diana L. Linden. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2015. xi + 170 pp.

One does not typically think of U.S. government funding as being a major or direct source of support for significant works of American Jewish art and culture, especially before the establishment of the National Endowment for the Arts in 1965. Among its other virtues, Diana Linden’s Ben Shahn’s New Deal Murals is a reminder of how a government agency’s support could result in enduring works of art that deal squarely with Jewish and American issues, respecting both categories while synthesizing them.

Linden’s study focuses on the murals that Shahn designed between 1936 and 1939 for The Treasury Section of Painting and Sculpture, which commissioned major works of art under the New Deal. The first such mural, installed at the Jersey Homesteads where Shahn lived for much of his life, measures 12 by 15 feet and tells the story of Jews’ immigration to America and industriousness as laborers and labor activists, including representations of Nazi anti-Semitism, Sacco and Vanzetti, Albert Einstein, and David Dubinsky, among others. The second, Resources of America, Shahn created with his companion Bernard Bryson for the Bronx Central Post Office, beginning in 1938. While Linden acknowledges “there is nothing about the subject matter, design, or content” of the thirteen panels, representing American workers, “that is explicitly Jewish,” she reads Shahn’s Jewishness as relevant in the reception of the mural (66). A quotation from Whitman was deemed “propaganda for irreligion” by a Brooklyn reverend, and Shahn responded by linking that censorship to Nazism before capitulating to pressure and changing the quotation (88). Finally, Shahn designed but never realized an aesthetically and politically ambitious plan for a mural for the St. Louis Post Office. Though not selected in that competition, eventually that plan was condensed, by the invitation of a government official, into an 8’6” by 16’ egg tempera on canvas work, titled First Amendment, for the Woodhaven Branch Post Office in Queens. Linden’s book reproduces more than sixty images in full color, including these murals themselves, Shahn’s studies, and other relevant works of art by Shahn and his contemporaries.

Linden offers precise, perceptive, and detailed readings of Shahn’s artwork, unpacking the symbols and formal strategies that make the murals distinctive and compelling. Such explication is especially welcome and helpful because of the nature of these large artworks. Like the famous murals of Diego Rivera that influenced them, they are comprised of many [End Page 104] scenes, often laden with specific photographic and historical references that could be lost on even a well-informed contemporary viewer.

Linden supplements these close readings with attention to the political and social contexts that inspired Shahn’s work. While these sections may be useful for art historians with little or no familiarity with American Jewish history, they will be less compelling to readers of American Jewish History for whom basic explanations of, for example, what the Jewish Daily Forward was will be superfluous. Though drawing on excellent work in the field of American Jewish history published in recent years, in a few places these historical summaries not only offer overly basic information, but also lapse into small inaccuracies. One case in point is the remark that Fiorella LaGuardia provided “greater assistance to American Jews over those of his own ethnic group,” which seems to ignore the well-known fact that LaGuardia’s mother was Jewish (21).

The argument Linden’s book makes most effectively is that it is worthwhile to consider Shahn’s work, notwithstanding that it was resolutely American in both its contexts and intentions, in relation to American Jewish culture. On the one hand, such an argument usefully counters the impression given in Shahn’s comments in a 1966 speech that he was a “human artist,” who would not “be interested in an exhibit of Jewish artists” (127). Yet on the other hand, of course many of Linden’s readers will already recognize Shahn...

pdf

Share