In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Of Dogs, Vacations, and Jews
  • Laura Leibman (bio)

In the era immediately preceding photography, silhouettes were all the rage: They were cheap, quick, and, at their best, they captured the essence of an individual. One of the greatest silhouette makers was Augustin Edouart, who, unlike inferior talents, could cut a likeness freehand in a few seconds, without the crutch of machines, shadows, or paint.1 Having made more than six thousand likenesses in England and Scotland, Edouart came to the United States in the late 1830s and became a favorite at vacation spots like Saratoga Springs, New York.2 It was in Saratoga Springs that he created the charming silhouette of two New Orleans Jews, Mr. and Mrs. Charles Tobias, and their dog on August 26, 1844.3 Folk portraits like Edouart’s unveil early American Jews’ everyday lives.

When faced with an early portrait, I usually begin with three questions: (1) What genre does the portrait manipulate? (2) Who made the portrait, when and where? and (3) What does the portrait proclaim about the sitters? Early American portraits employ a variety of genres with distinct conventions. Prior to the invention of the daguerreotype in 1839, the most popular genres of portraiture patronized by early American Jews were miniatures painted on ivory, half- and full-length paintings, drawings in pen or crayon, and silhouettes. Silhouettes offered both value and social cachet. To have your portrait cut by Edouart, for example, was to place yourself among the ranks of the royal family, famous authors, and statesmen, yet silhouettes were much cheaper than most other kinds of portraits and typically cost only one to six shillings.4 Both professionals and amateurs made silhouettes, including Jewish women, as evidenced by Edouart’s portrait of Rebecca Moses cutting a silhouette.5

Silhouettes were associated with leisure: hence, the portrait’s who, where, and when are revealing. Silhouettes correlate with the rise of the [End Page 90] tourist trade and the importance of leisure for class identity. Leisure had an impact on where the portrait was made. In England, Edouart plied his craft primarily at popular spas at Bath, Cheltenham, and Leamington. In North America, many of his pieces were made at the fashionable Saratoga Springs, where he spent five summers.6 Although Edouart also made excursions to major cities, spas provided much of his income, not only because of the bath’s high turnover rate, but also because baths attracted the rich and powerful and those who aspired to become so. Those aspirations fed the silhouette industry. As historian Andrew Oliver notes, people came to the baths with conspicuous consumption in mind: “However occupied the visitors may have been at home, the springs freed them with money in their pockets and whim and leisure to spend it.”7 Prior to the 1877 scandal when the Hiltons refused banker and merchant Joseph Seligman a room in the Grand Union Hotel, we have rather paltry early information about Jews’ Saratoga Springs vacations. For Hilton, Seligman and Jews like him represented the “vulgar ostentation…and a general obtrusiveness that is frequently disgusting and always repulsive to the well-bred.”8 Although rivaled by Newport in the late nineteenth century, Saratoga Springs was one of the great “social centers of America’s leisure class” in the 1840s.9 By going to the baths, Southern and Northern Jews tried to mark themselves as “members of the fashionable elite.”10 Edouart’s silhouettes of Jews reveal how Jews navigated these tricky social waters by showing what Jews wore while on vacation, their hairstyles, and—as I will discuss—what social props they brought with them to the baths.

Leisure and conspicuous consumption are the principle themes of the Tobias silhouette. Edouart’s great skill was catching a sitter in a moment of play, and this silhouette is no exception. Some of Edouart’s most charming pieces show people playing ball, jousting, being tickled, waving a whip, acting, or playing an instrument. These action-based silhouettes set Edouart apart, as his freehand allowed him to capture people midmovement. Rather than requiring sitters to remain perfectly still, Edouart encouraged them to “run about the room…[as] by these means, I am better...

pdf

Share