Abstract

Abstract:

As records in the Digital Miscellanies Index (DMI) reveal, verse in miscellanies was printed without attribution or was attributed via descriptive epithets, pseudonyms, or partial indications of a poet’s name at least as often as it was printed with a clear and unambiguous identification of an author. Any reader who wished to identify which works in a miscellany had been written by a particular poet often faced considerable difficulties. This article focuses on a small but significant group of poems that challenged miscellany readers interested in knowing whose works they were reading: those poems, the authorship of which was (or appeared to be) disputed. This article considers how, through accident or design, misattributions entered into and persisted in the printed record. Each case of disputed authorship provides insight into the reception history of the poem under discussion, as well as into the contribution that miscellanies made to the shaping of authorial reputations.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
1086-3192
Print ISSN
0098-2601
Pages
pp. 142-157
Launched on MUSE
2016-12-17
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.