Abstract

Canonical jurisprudence, in the strict sense, is what arises from an ensemble of concordant judicial decisions on a particular matter. Typically, therefore, neither an individual decision nor the decisions of an individual judge nor the most recent decision(s) create jurisprudence. Rather, this happens over the course of time through the activity of diverse judges operating according to consistent principles of juridical logic. In the Church, as regards the matter of the nullity of marriage, the jurisprudential authority is the Tribunal of the Roman Rota, whose rich patrimony promotes a unity of jurisprudence. The ordinary pontifical Magisterium directs this jurisprudence, and the vigilance of the Apostolic Signatura promotes it. Local jurisprudence in this area may not justly diverge from Rotal jurisprudence but receives and applies it to local situations.

pdf

Additional Information

ISSN
2326-6236
Print ISSN
0022-6858
Pages
pp. 197-229
Launched on MUSE
2016-11-24
Open Access
No
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.