In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • Mobilizing New York: AIDS, Antipoverty, and Feminist Activism by Tamar W. Carroll
  • Gopika Krishna
Mobilizing New York: AIDS, Antipoverty, and Feminist Activism. By Tamar W. Carroll. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2015. 304pages. Paperback, $34.95

Tamar Carroll opens her book, Mobilizing New York, by describing a 1991 demonstration in which the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) and Women’s [End Page 460] Health Action and Mobilization (WHAM!) placed a banner reading “No Choice, No Liberty” over the Statue of Liberty’s face: a pro-choice gesture as grand and visible as the city’s most recognizable monument itself. Carroll uses this example to demonstrate New York’s “long history of direct action” (3). With its diverse ethnic, socioeconomic, and political makeup, as well as numerous eminent landmarks of American culture and power, New York has easily become a locus for social movements. Many large-scale demonstrations have had their roots in New York City, from the Progressive Era reforms of the late 1800s to the Occupy Wall Street movement in 2011.

Given this rich history, it is unsurprising that Carroll uses New York City as her backdrop for discussing notable grassroots activism in the late twentieth century. She contends that the organizations that most effectively enacted change were those that not only used resources to mobilize marginalized people directly but also enabled coalition building among various identity groups. To illustrate her point, Carroll examines three case studies: the creation of the anti-poverty organization Mobilization for Youth, the class-conscious feminism of Brooklyn’s National Congress of Neighborhood Women, and ACT UP and WHAM!’s fight for bodily autonomy during the AIDS crisis. The text draws upon a wide variety of historical resources, including over fifty oral histories Carroll herself collected, as well as archived oral histories, historical records, and newspaper clippings.

In part 1 of Mobilizing New York, Carroll describes the antipoverty efforts of Mobilization for Youth (MFY), an organization born out of efforts from the Kennedy administration to diminish juvenile delinquency, primarily in Manhattan’s Lower East Side. The program adopted principles of “maximum feasible participation,” prioritizing the involvement of poor people in decision making for antipoverty programs (10). It also hired paraprofessionals, neighborhood residents who were valued for their knowledge of the area, allowing for greater cooperation between the largely white, middle-class social workers and the African American and Puerto Rican constituents. Through its open relationship with neighborhood residents, MFY facilitated political coalition building and skills training for African American and Puerto Rican mothers, empowering them to utilize such direct action tactics as boycotts and rent strikes to demand better education for their children. Even with MFY’s dissolution in the late 1960s, its programs left a lasting legacy through its support of the Black Arts Movement, eventually setting a model for President Johnson’s Economic Opportunity Act.

Part 2 of Carroll’s book follows one of MFY’s social workers, Janet Peterson, to the Williamsburg-Greenpoint area of Brooklyn. In a time when New York City’s fiscal crisis resulted in job loss for the middle class as well as spending cuts to social services and housing, racial tensions between African Americans, Latinos, and white ethnics were high. Inspired by the principles of maximum [End Page 461] feasible participation, Peterson set out to help working class women in the neighborhood through the cofounding the National Congress of Neighborhood Women in 1974. Given the strong ethnic tensions in the area, as well as cultural differences between “professional staff” and local women, Peterson utilized a model of identity-based consciousness-raising which “interrogated” intersections of markers of identity to create “identity-based organizing” and gave neighborhood women decision-making power (104). The result was not only a strong interracial coalition of politically engaged women but also a community that embraced diverse definitions of feminism/femininity through the lenses of race, ethnicity, and class status.

In the last part of the book, Carroll lays out the sociopolitical geography of a 1980s New York City—one where little public funds were available for social service administration and an increasingly conservative government backed the interests of banking, finance, and the Religious Right. The...

pdf

Share