In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:
  • A World More Concrete: Real Estate and the Remaking of Jim Crow South Florida by N. D. B. Connolly
  • LeeAnn Lands
N. D. B. Connolly. A World More Concrete: Real Estate and the Remaking of Jim Crow South Florida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015. xiii + 389 pp. ISBN 978-0-226-11514-6, $45.00 (cloth); 978-0-226-37842-8, $27.00 (paper); 978-0-226-13525-0, $7 to $45 (e-book).

Joining a robust collection of works examining race, class, and housing, A World More Concrete exposes how strategies of land development [End Page 707] reflected and constructed power, race, and class in Miami, Florida, and how real estate and its control informed modern notions of liberalism. Along the way, Nathan Connolly reveals the heretofore overlooked role of rental housing development and landlord power in the making of the twentieth-century city. Organized into three sections, and drawing on government program and gubernatorial records, interviews, and newspaper and radio stories, A World More Concrete sorts through the foundation building (roughly the late 1800s to the Great Depression), construction (1930s and 1940s), and renovation (post-World War II) of the relationship between real estate, power, and citizenship.

Miami’s early twentieth-century development was, Connolly explains, informed by racial practices and protocols common to U.S. cities. As job opportunities lured Bahamians and others to Miami, whites felt the need to tighten the boundaries of Colored Town, the locus of black housing originally launched by railroad magnate Henry Flagler. Expressing a pragmatism that would endure the next few decades, the land-owning blacks of the Colored Board of Trade agreed to firmer racial segregation if it dampened the worst elements of white terrorism and protected black property and capital. Status distinctions within black Miami continued to emerge, in part through national origin. Blacks of British and British colonial descent networked through South Florida’s Overseas Club, for example. The Universal Negro Improvement Association, in contrast, allowed Miamians of color to organize across national origin. South and west of the city, white real estate visionaries worked with self-appointed representative of the Seminole people, Tony Tommie, to seize “the last frontier” of South Florida. This land, along with aging and black neighborhoods throughout Miami, would be worked and reworked as political leaders and real estate interests realized their vision of a Pan-American “Magic City.”

Exploding population growth strained housing resources and forced vigorous debates about black housing conditions and racial boundaries throughout the mid-twentieth century. The burgeoning black-occupied Railroad Shop neighborhood so alarmed white residents of adjacent Allapattah that various white civic organizations petitioned Miami leadership to condemn the black neighborhood for use as a park or playground for Allapattah’s white residents. Officials complied, and Railroad Shop families who did not successfully negotiate with the city or otherwise accept relocation were summarily evicted. Connolly’s history, however, is much more than a retracing of white fear of black encroachment.

Filling a significant gap in our understanding of urban development and the business of housing, Connolly sorts through the (big) business of rental housing development, exposing the influence, workings, and power of landlords, property managers, and the larger rental housing industry. Particularly rich is Connolly’s description of white Luther [End Page 708] Brooks and his Bonded Collection Agency, which managed property for black and white rental housing owners across the city. As he grew the Bonded agency to operate satellite offices and employ a host of (black) maintenance men and (white) rent collectors, Brooks became one of the most powerful real estate operators in South Florida. Brooks cultivated a paternalistic relationship with staff and tenants, and drawing on this web of personal relationships, he and others like him (black and white) controlled significant black tenant voting power that was used to oppose public housing and support other private housing interests. While Brooks was white, Connolly’s narrative of Bonded’s work exposes the interracial nature of rental housing investment and development. While whites were the majority of housing investors and landlords, blacks owned substantial rental property and participated in the growth and maintenance of the rental housing market. In Miami, Connolly explains...

pdf

Share